18 Shops · 56,847+ Products

Comparison: Kumho Ecsta Sport (PS72) vs. Hankook ION Evo vs. Falken e.Ziex

Test Profile

Kumho
Ecsta Sport (PS72)
Hankook
ION Evo
Falken
e.Ziex
Number of tests
3
1
3
Best position
#1
#1
#2
Average position
4.0
1.0
3.7
Latest test
2026
2025
2025
Available sizes
54
64
34

Wet

Wet
Kumho Ecsta Sport (PS72)
69%
Hankook ION Evo
89%
Falken e.Ziex
75%
Aquaplaning - cross
Kumho Ecsta Sport (PS72)
73%
Hankook ION Evo
87%
Falken e.Ziex
61%
Aquaplaning - longitudal
Kumho Ecsta Sport (PS72)
75%
Hankook ION Evo
77%
Falken e.Ziex
68%
Wet braking
Kumho Ecsta Sport (PS72)
62%
Hankook ION Evo
97%
Falken e.Ziex
87%
Wet handling
Kumho Ecsta Sport (PS72)
69%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
Falken e.Ziex
69%

Dry

Dry
Kumho Ecsta Sport (PS72)
71%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
Falken e.Ziex
85%
Dry braking
Kumho Ecsta Sport (PS72)
69%
Hankook ION Evo
91%
Falken e.Ziex
88%
Dry handling
Kumho Ecsta Sport (PS72)
71%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
Falken e.Ziex
81%

Comfort

Comfort
Kumho Ecsta Sport (PS72)
52%
Hankook ION Evo
72%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Exterior noise
Kumho Ecsta Sport (PS72)
52%
Hankook ION Evo
66%
Falken e.Ziex
78%

Costs

Costs
Kumho Ecsta Sport (PS72)
76%
Hankook ION Evo
71%
Falken e.Ziex
80%
Rolling resistance
Kumho Ecsta Sport (PS72)
76%
Hankook ION Evo
69%
Falken e.Ziex
95%

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Add to comparison

Popular brands
New comparison