Comparison: Kumho Ecsta Sport (PS72) vs. Hankook ION Evo vs. Falken e.Ziex

Upper-middle

Kumho

Ecsta Sport (PS72)

VS

ION Evo

e.Ziex

9.0

R15 – R21

Also compare with

SportContact 7

Ventus Evo

PremiumContact 7

Test Profile

Ecsta Sport (PS72)

ION Evo

e.Ziex

Number of tests

3

1

3

Best position

#1

#2

Average position

4.0

1.0

3.7

Latest test

2026

2025

Available sizes

54

64

34

Wet

Kumho Ecsta Sport (PS72)

69%

Hankook ION Evo

89%

Falken e.Ziex

75%

Aquaplaning - cross

Kumho Ecsta Sport (PS72)

73%

Hankook ION Evo

87%

Falken e.Ziex

61%

Aquaplaning - longitudal

Kumho Ecsta Sport (PS72)

75%

Hankook ION Evo

77%

Falken e.Ziex

68%

Wet braking

Kumho Ecsta Sport (PS72)

62%

Hankook ION Evo

97%

Falken e.Ziex

87%

Wet handling

Kumho Ecsta Sport (PS72)

69%

Hankook ION Evo

92%

Falken e.Ziex

69%

Dry

Kumho Ecsta Sport (PS72)

71%

Hankook ION Evo

92%

Falken e.Ziex

85%

Dry braking

Kumho Ecsta Sport (PS72)

69%

Hankook ION Evo

91%

Falken e.Ziex

88%

Dry handling

Kumho Ecsta Sport (PS72)

71%

Hankook ION Evo

92%

Falken e.Ziex

81%

Comfort

Kumho Ecsta Sport (PS72)

52%

Hankook ION Evo

72%

Falken e.Ziex

78%

Exterior noise

Kumho Ecsta Sport (PS72)

52%

Hankook ION Evo

66%

Falken e.Ziex

78%

Costs

Kumho Ecsta Sport (PS72)

76%

Hankook ION Evo

71%

Falken e.Ziex

80%

Rolling resistance

Kumho Ecsta Sport (PS72)

76%

Hankook ION Evo

69%

Falken e.Ziex

95%

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Comparison: Kumho Ecsta Sport (PS72) vs. Hankook ION Evo vs. Falken e.Ziex

Ecsta Sport (PS72)

ION Evo

e.Ziex

Test Profile

Wet

Dry

Comfort

Costs

Dimensions and prices

Add to comparison