Comparison: Kumho Ecsta Sport (PS72) vs. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 vs. Michelin e.Primacy vs. Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV vs. Falken e.Ziex

Upper-middle

Kumho

Ecsta Sport (PS72)

VS

Also compare with

SportContact 7

UltraContact NXT

Ventus Evo

Test Profile

Ecsta Sport (PS72)

Efficientgrip Performance 2

e.Primacy

Efficientgrip 2 SUV

e.Ziex

Number of tests

5

4

5

3

Best position

#1

#2

#3

#1

#2

Average position

4.4

3.3

12.0

2.2

3.7

Latest test

2026

2025

Available sizes

99

40

111

63

36

Wet

Kumho Ecsta Sport (PS72)

77%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

82%

Michelin e.Primacy

66%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

83%

Falken e.Ziex

75%

Aquaplaning - cross

Kumho Ecsta Sport (PS72)

68%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

73%

Michelin e.Primacy

56%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

82%

Falken e.Ziex

61%

Wet braking

Kumho Ecsta Sport (PS72)

78%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

84%

Michelin e.Primacy

70%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

85%

Falken e.Ziex

87%

Aquaplaning - longitudal

Kumho Ecsta Sport (PS72)

74%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

71%

Michelin e.Primacy

68%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

78%

Falken e.Ziex

68%

Wet handling

Kumho Ecsta Sport (PS72)

75%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

81%

Michelin e.Primacy

63%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

86%

Falken e.Ziex

69%

Wet circle cornering

Kumho Ecsta Sport (PS72)

92%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

81%

Michelin e.Primacy

64%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

79%

Falken e.Ziex

77%

Dry

Kumho Ecsta Sport (PS72)

75%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

79%

Michelin e.Primacy

80%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

83%

Falken e.Ziex

85%

Dry braking

Kumho Ecsta Sport (PS72)

80%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

82%

Michelin e.Primacy

83%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

82%

Falken e.Ziex

88%

Dry handling

Kumho Ecsta Sport (PS72)

71%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

80%

Michelin e.Primacy

80%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

84%

Falken e.Ziex

81%

Dry lane changing

Kumho Ecsta Sport (PS72)

75%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

75%

Michelin e.Primacy

93%

Falken e.Ziex

87%

Costs

Kumho Ecsta Sport (PS72)

70%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

88%

Michelin e.Primacy

100%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

84%

Falken e.Ziex

80%

Rolling resistance

Kumho Ecsta Sport (PS72)

71%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

81%

Michelin e.Primacy

100%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

77%

Falken e.Ziex

95%

Mileage

Kumho Ecsta Sport (PS72)

69%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

99%

Michelin e.Primacy

100%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

96%

Falken e.Ziex

60%

Comfort

Kumho Ecsta Sport (PS72)

72%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

78%

Michelin e.Primacy

88%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

92%

Falken e.Ziex

78%

Exterior noise

Kumho Ecsta Sport (PS72)

71%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

80%

Michelin e.Primacy

90%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

90%

Falken e.Ziex

78%

Comfort

Kumho Ecsta Sport (PS72)

73%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

83%

Michelin e.Primacy

87%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

83%

Falken e.Ziex

78%

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Comparison: Kumho Ecsta Sport (PS72) vs. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 vs. Michelin e.Primacy vs. Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV vs. Falken e.Ziex

Ecsta Sport (PS72)

Efficientgrip Performance 2

e.Primacy

Efficientgrip 2 SUV

e.Ziex

Test Profile

Wet

Dry

Costs

Comfort

Dimensions and prices

Add to comparison