Comparison: Kumho Ecsta Sport (PS72) vs. Falken e.Ziex vs. Hankook ION Evo

Upper-middle

Kumho

Ecsta Sport (PS72)

VS

e.Ziex

ION Evo

9.0

R17 – R22

Also compare with

SportContact 7

Ventus Evo

PremiumContact 7

Test Profile

Ecsta Sport (PS72)

e.Ziex

ION Evo

Number of tests

3

1

Best position

#1

#2

#1

Average position

4.0

3.7

1.0

Latest test

2026

2025

Available sizes

54

34

64

Wet

Kumho Ecsta Sport (PS72)

69%

Falken e.Ziex

75%

Hankook ION Evo

89%

Aquaplaning - longitudal

Kumho Ecsta Sport (PS72)

75%

Falken e.Ziex

68%

Hankook ION Evo

77%

Wet braking

Kumho Ecsta Sport (PS72)

62%

Falken e.Ziex

87%

Hankook ION Evo

97%

Wet handling

Kumho Ecsta Sport (PS72)

69%

Falken e.Ziex

69%

Hankook ION Evo

92%

Aquaplaning - cross

Kumho Ecsta Sport (PS72)

73%

Falken e.Ziex

61%

Hankook ION Evo

87%

Dry

Kumho Ecsta Sport (PS72)

71%

Falken e.Ziex

85%

Hankook ION Evo

92%

Dry braking

Kumho Ecsta Sport (PS72)

69%

Falken e.Ziex

88%

Hankook ION Evo

91%

Dry handling

Kumho Ecsta Sport (PS72)

71%

Falken e.Ziex

81%

Hankook ION Evo

92%

Costs

Kumho Ecsta Sport (PS72)

76%

Falken e.Ziex

80%

Hankook ION Evo

71%

Rolling resistance

Kumho Ecsta Sport (PS72)

76%

Falken e.Ziex

95%

Hankook ION Evo

69%

Comfort

Kumho Ecsta Sport (PS72)

52%

Falken e.Ziex

78%

Hankook ION Evo

72%

Exterior noise

Kumho Ecsta Sport (PS72)

52%

Falken e.Ziex

78%

Hankook ION Evo

66%

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Comparison: Kumho Ecsta Sport (PS72) vs. Falken e.Ziex vs. Hankook ION Evo

Ecsta Sport (PS72)

e.Ziex

ION Evo

Test Profile

Wet

Dry

Costs

Comfort

Dimensions and prices

Add to comparison