Comparison: Kumho Ecsta Sport (PS72) vs. Continental PremiumContact 7 vs. Falken e.Ziex

Upper-middle

Kumho

Ecsta Sport (PS72)

VS

PremiumContact 7

e.Ziex

9.0

R15 – R21

Also compare with

SportContact 7

Ventus Evo

Pilot Sport 5

Test Profile

Ecsta Sport (PS72)

PremiumContact 7

e.Ziex

Number of tests

3

26

3

Best position

#1

#2

Average position

4.0

2.2

3.7

Latest test

2026

2025

Available sizes

54

66

34

Wet

Kumho Ecsta Sport (PS72)

69%

Continental PremiumContact 7

90%

Falken e.Ziex

75%

Wet handling

Kumho Ecsta Sport (PS72)

69%

Continental PremiumContact 7

90%

Falken e.Ziex

69%

Aquaplaning - cross

Kumho Ecsta Sport (PS72)

73%

Continental PremiumContact 7

76%

Falken e.Ziex

61%

Aquaplaning - longitudal

Kumho Ecsta Sport (PS72)

75%

Continental PremiumContact 7

75%

Falken e.Ziex

68%

Wet braking

Kumho Ecsta Sport (PS72)

62%

Continental PremiumContact 7

94%

Falken e.Ziex

87%

Dry

Kumho Ecsta Sport (PS72)

71%

Continental PremiumContact 7

90%

Falken e.Ziex

85%

Dry handling

Kumho Ecsta Sport (PS72)

71%

Continental PremiumContact 7

85%

Falken e.Ziex

81%

Dry lane changing

Kumho Ecsta Sport (PS72)

75%

Continental PremiumContact 7

85%

Falken e.Ziex

87%

Dry braking

Kumho Ecsta Sport (PS72)

69%

Continental PremiumContact 7

90%

Falken e.Ziex

88%

Comfort

Kumho Ecsta Sport (PS72)

52%

Continental PremiumContact 7

76%

Falken e.Ziex

78%

Exterior noise

Kumho Ecsta Sport (PS72)

52%

Continental PremiumContact 7

69%

Falken e.Ziex

78%

Costs

Kumho Ecsta Sport (PS72)

76%

Continental PremiumContact 7

76%

Falken e.Ziex

80%

Rolling resistance

Kumho Ecsta Sport (PS72)

76%

Continental PremiumContact 7

75%

Falken e.Ziex

95%

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Comparison: Kumho Ecsta Sport (PS72) vs. Continental PremiumContact 7 vs. Falken e.Ziex

Ecsta Sport (PS72)

PremiumContact 7

e.Ziex

Test Profile

Wet

Dry

Comfort

Costs

Dimensions and prices

Add to comparison