18 Shops · 56,847+ Products

Comparison: Kumho Ecsta PS71 vs. Michelin Pilot Sport 4 S vs. Falken e.Ziex

Test Profile

Kumho
Ecsta PS71
Michelin
Pilot Sport 4 S
Falken
e.Ziex
Number of tests
15
10
3
Best position
#2
#1
#2
Average position
9.0
2.1
3.7
Latest test
2025
2025
2025
Available sizes
225
195
34

Wet

Wet
Kumho Ecsta PS71
79%
Michelin Pilot Sport 4 S
75%
Falken e.Ziex
75%
Wet handling
Kumho Ecsta PS71
79%
Michelin Pilot Sport 4 S
84%
Falken e.Ziex
69%
Aquaplaning - cross
Kumho Ecsta PS71
87%
Michelin Pilot Sport 4 S
85%
Falken e.Ziex
61%
Aquaplaning - longitudal
Kumho Ecsta PS71
90%
Michelin Pilot Sport 4 S
87%
Falken e.Ziex
68%
Wet braking
Kumho Ecsta PS71
79%
Michelin Pilot Sport 4 S
88%
Falken e.Ziex
87%
Wet circle cornering
Kumho Ecsta PS71
72%
Michelin Pilot Sport 4 S
88%
Falken e.Ziex
77%

Dry

Dry
Kumho Ecsta PS71
72%
Michelin Pilot Sport 4 S
83%
Falken e.Ziex
85%
Dry braking
Kumho Ecsta PS71
76%
Michelin Pilot Sport 4 S
95%
Falken e.Ziex
88%
Dry handling
Kumho Ecsta PS71
81%
Michelin Pilot Sport 4 S
96%
Falken e.Ziex
81%

Offroad

Offroad
Kumho Ecsta PS71
79%

Comfort

Comfort
Kumho Ecsta PS71
67%
Michelin Pilot Sport 4 S
75%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Exterior noise
Kumho Ecsta PS71
62%
Michelin Pilot Sport 4 S
70%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Comfort
Kumho Ecsta PS71
72%
Michelin Pilot Sport 4 S
81%
Falken e.Ziex
78%

Costs

Costs
Kumho Ecsta PS71
71%
Michelin Pilot Sport 4 S
81%
Falken e.Ziex
80%
Rolling resistance
Kumho Ecsta PS71
73%
Michelin Pilot Sport 4 S
81%
Falken e.Ziex
95%
Mileage
Kumho Ecsta PS71
65%
Falken e.Ziex
60%
Price/value
Kumho Ecsta PS71
63%
Falken e.Ziex
60%

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Add to comparison

Popular brands
New comparison