18 Shops · 56,847+ Products

Comparison: Kumho Ecsta PS71 vs. Hankook ION Evo vs. Michelin Pilot Sport 4 S

Test Profile

Kumho
Ecsta PS71
Hankook
ION Evo
Michelin
Pilot Sport 4 S
Number of tests
15
1
10
Best position
#2
#1
#1
Average position
9.0
1.0
2.1
Latest test
2025
2025
2025
Available sizes
225
64
195

Wet

Wet
Kumho Ecsta PS71
79%
Hankook ION Evo
89%
Michelin Pilot Sport 4 S
75%
Wet handling
Kumho Ecsta PS71
79%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
Michelin Pilot Sport 4 S
84%
Wet braking
Kumho Ecsta PS71
79%
Hankook ION Evo
97%
Michelin Pilot Sport 4 S
88%
Aquaplaning - cross
Kumho Ecsta PS71
87%
Hankook ION Evo
87%
Michelin Pilot Sport 4 S
85%
Aquaplaning - longitudal
Kumho Ecsta PS71
90%
Hankook ION Evo
77%
Michelin Pilot Sport 4 S
87%
Wet circle cornering
Kumho Ecsta PS71
72%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
Michelin Pilot Sport 4 S
88%

Dry

Dry
Kumho Ecsta PS71
72%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
Michelin Pilot Sport 4 S
83%
Dry braking
Kumho Ecsta PS71
76%
Hankook ION Evo
91%
Michelin Pilot Sport 4 S
95%
Dry handling
Kumho Ecsta PS71
81%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
Michelin Pilot Sport 4 S
96%

Offroad

Offroad
Kumho Ecsta PS71
79%

Comfort

Comfort
Kumho Ecsta PS71
67%
Hankook ION Evo
72%
Michelin Pilot Sport 4 S
75%
Exterior noise
Kumho Ecsta PS71
62%
Hankook ION Evo
66%
Michelin Pilot Sport 4 S
70%
Comfort
Kumho Ecsta PS71
72%
Hankook ION Evo
78%
Michelin Pilot Sport 4 S
81%

Costs

Costs
Kumho Ecsta PS71
71%
Hankook ION Evo
71%
Michelin Pilot Sport 4 S
81%
Rolling resistance
Kumho Ecsta PS71
73%
Hankook ION Evo
69%
Michelin Pilot Sport 4 S
81%
Mileage
Kumho Ecsta PS71
65%
Hankook ION Evo
82%
Price/value
Kumho Ecsta PS71
63%
Hankook ION Evo
60%

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Add to comparison

Popular brands
New comparison