18 Shops · 56,847+ Products

Comparator | Contact Us

Comparison: Kumho Ecsta PS71 vs. Hankook ION Evo vs. Falken e.Ziex

Kumho Ecsta PS71

Kumho

Ecsta PS71

VS

Hankook ION Evo

Hankook

ION Evo

Falken e.Ziex

Falken

e.Ziex

Also compare with

PremiumContact 7

Test Profile

Kumho

Ecsta PS71

Hankook

ION Evo

Falken

e.Ziex

Number of tests

15

1

3

Best position

#2

#1

#2

Average position

9.0

1.0

3.7

Latest test

2025

2025

2025

Available sizes

225

64

34

Wet

Wet

Kumho Ecsta PS71

79%

Hankook ION Evo

89%

Falken e.Ziex

75%

Wet handling

Kumho Ecsta PS71

79%

Hankook ION Evo

92%

Falken e.Ziex

69%

Aquaplaning - longitudal

Kumho Ecsta PS71

90%

Hankook ION Evo

77%

Falken e.Ziex

68%

Wet braking

Kumho Ecsta PS71

79%

Hankook ION Evo

97%

Falken e.Ziex

87%

Aquaplaning - cross

Kumho Ecsta PS71

87%

Hankook ION Evo

87%

Falken e.Ziex

61%

Wet circle cornering

Kumho Ecsta PS71

72%

Hankook ION Evo

92%

Falken e.Ziex

77%

Dry

Dry

Kumho Ecsta PS71

72%

Hankook ION Evo

92%

Falken e.Ziex

85%

Dry braking

Kumho Ecsta PS71

76%

Hankook ION Evo

91%

Falken e.Ziex

88%

Dry handling

Kumho Ecsta PS71

81%

Hankook ION Evo

92%

Falken e.Ziex

81%

Offroad

Offroad

Kumho Ecsta PS71

79%

Comfort

Comfort

Kumho Ecsta PS71

67%

Hankook ION Evo

72%

Falken e.Ziex

78%

Exterior noise

Kumho Ecsta PS71

62%

Hankook ION Evo

66%

Falken e.Ziex

78%

Comfort

Kumho Ecsta PS71

72%

Hankook ION Evo

78%

Falken e.Ziex

78%

Costs

Costs

Kumho Ecsta PS71

71%

Hankook ION Evo

71%

Falken e.Ziex

80%

Rolling resistance

Kumho Ecsta PS71

73%

Hankook ION Evo

69%

Falken e.Ziex

95%

Mileage

Kumho Ecsta PS71

65%

Hankook ION Evo

82%

Falken e.Ziex

60%

Price/value

Kumho Ecsta PS71

63%

Hankook ION Evo

60%

Falken e.Ziex

60%

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Add to comparison