18 Shops · 56,847+ Products

Comparison: Kumho Ecsta PS71 vs. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 vs. Hankook Ventus Evo

Test Profile

Kumho
Ecsta PS71
BFGoodrich
G-FORCE WINTER 2
Hankook
Ventus Evo
Number of tests
15
23
3
Best position
#2
#1
#2
Average position
9.0
6.7
3.3
Latest test
2025
2025
2026
Available sizes
225
107
60

Wet

Wet
Kumho Ecsta PS71
79%
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
70%
Hankook Ventus Evo
87%
Wet handling
Kumho Ecsta PS71
79%
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
69%
Hankook Ventus Evo
87%
Aquaplaning - cross
Kumho Ecsta PS71
87%
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
76%
Hankook Ventus Evo
71%
Aquaplaning - longitudal
Kumho Ecsta PS71
90%
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
86%
Hankook Ventus Evo
81%
Wet braking
Kumho Ecsta PS71
79%
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
67%
Hankook Ventus Evo
95%
Wet circle cornering
Kumho Ecsta PS71
72%
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
65%
Hankook Ventus Evo
96%

Dry

Dry
Kumho Ecsta PS71
72%
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
72%
Hankook Ventus Evo
83%
Dry braking
Kumho Ecsta PS71
76%
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
72%
Hankook Ventus Evo
76%
Dry handling
Kumho Ecsta PS71
81%
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
67%
Hankook Ventus Evo
90%
Dry driving behavior
Kumho Ecsta PS71
67%
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
73%

Offroad

Offroad
Kumho Ecsta PS71
79%

Comfort

Comfort
Kumho Ecsta PS71
67%
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
79%
Hankook Ventus Evo
75%
Exterior noise
Kumho Ecsta PS71
62%
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
83%
Hankook Ventus Evo
73%
Comfort
Kumho Ecsta PS71
72%
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
74%
Hankook Ventus Evo
76%

Costs

Costs
Kumho Ecsta PS71
71%
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
75%
Hankook Ventus Evo
80%
Rolling resistance
Kumho Ecsta PS71
73%
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
73%
Hankook Ventus Evo
86%
Mileage
Kumho Ecsta PS71
65%
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
73%
Hankook Ventus Evo
71%
Price/value
Kumho Ecsta PS71
63%
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
68%
Hankook Ventus Evo
71%

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Add to comparison

Popular brands
New comparison