18 Shops · 56,847+ Products

Comparator | Contact Us

Comparison: Kumho Ecsta PS71 SUV vs. Hankook ION Evo vs. Falken e.Ziex

Kumho Ecsta PS71 SUV

Kumho

Ecsta PS71 SUV

VS

Hankook ION Evo

Hankook

ION Evo

Falken e.Ziex

Falken

e.Ziex

Also compare with

PremiumContact 7

UltraContact NXT

Test Profile

Kumho

Ecsta PS71 SUV

Hankook

ION Evo

Falken

e.Ziex

Number of tests

1

1

3

Best position

#6

#1

#2

Average position

6.0

1.0

3.7

Latest test

2025

2025

2025

Available sizes

55

64

34

Wet

Wet

Kumho Ecsta PS71 SUV

77%

Hankook ION Evo

89%

Falken e.Ziex

75%

Wet handling

Kumho Ecsta PS71 SUV

71%

Hankook ION Evo

92%

Falken e.Ziex

69%

Aquaplaning - cross

Kumho Ecsta PS71 SUV

76%

Hankook ION Evo

87%

Falken e.Ziex

61%

Aquaplaning - longitudal

Kumho Ecsta PS71 SUV

76%

Hankook ION Evo

77%

Falken e.Ziex

68%

Wet braking

Kumho Ecsta PS71 SUV

84%

Hankook ION Evo

97%

Falken e.Ziex

87%

Offroad

Offroad

Kumho Ecsta PS71 SUV

74%

Dry

Dry

Kumho Ecsta PS71 SUV

79%

Hankook ION Evo

92%

Falken e.Ziex

85%

Dry braking

Kumho Ecsta PS71 SUV

73%

Hankook ION Evo

91%

Falken e.Ziex

88%

Dry handling

Kumho Ecsta PS71 SUV

84%

Hankook ION Evo

92%

Falken e.Ziex

81%

Comfort

Comfort

Kumho Ecsta PS71 SUV

74%

Hankook ION Evo

72%

Falken e.Ziex

78%

Exterior noise

Kumho Ecsta PS71 SUV

81%

Hankook ION Evo

66%

Falken e.Ziex

78%

Comfort

Kumho Ecsta PS71 SUV

67%

Hankook ION Evo

78%

Falken e.Ziex

78%

Costs

Costs

Kumho Ecsta PS71 SUV

60%

Hankook ION Evo

71%

Falken e.Ziex

80%

Rolling resistance

Kumho Ecsta PS71 SUV

60%

Hankook ION Evo

69%

Falken e.Ziex

95%

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Add to comparison