18 Shops · 56,847+ Products

Comparison: Kumho Ecsta PS71 SUV vs. Firestone Roadhawk 2

In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from South Korea (Kumho) against a tyre from a manufacturer from USA (Firestone). Generally, Firestone summer tyres are slightly better rated (70%) than Kumho (59%). In this particular case, the Firestone Roadhawk 2 has a better rating of 80% compared to 64% of the Kumho Ecsta PS71 SUV. The first tyre test of Kumho Ecsta PS71 SUV was done in 2025, compared to 2024 when was the Firestone Roadhawk 2 first tested. When it comes to comparison, eu labels can be also interesting - 96% of Kumho Ecsta PS71 SUV dimensions has A wet grip rating. Most (98%) of the Firestone Roadhawk 2 also have A wet ratings.

Test Profile

Kumho
Ecsta PS71 SUV
Firestone
Roadhawk 2
Number of tests
1
6
Best position
#6
#3
Average position
6.0
4.7
Latest test
2025
2026
Available sizes
55
146

Wet

Wet
Kumho Ecsta PS71 SUV
77%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
86%
Wet handling
Kumho Ecsta PS71 SUV
71%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
88%
Aquaplaning - cross
Kumho Ecsta PS71 SUV
76%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
88%
Aquaplaning - longitudal
Kumho Ecsta PS71 SUV
76%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
95%
Wet braking
Kumho Ecsta PS71 SUV
84%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
78%
Wet circle cornering
Kumho Ecsta PS71 SUV
75%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
84%

Offroad

Offroad
Kumho Ecsta PS71 SUV
74%

Dry

Dry
Kumho Ecsta PS71 SUV
79%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
79%
Dry braking
Kumho Ecsta PS71 SUV
73%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
81%
Dry handling
Kumho Ecsta PS71 SUV
84%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
77%

Comfort

Comfort
Kumho Ecsta PS71 SUV
74%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
77%
Exterior noise
Kumho Ecsta PS71 SUV
81%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
66%
Comfort
Kumho Ecsta PS71 SUV
67%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
71%

Costs

Costs
Kumho Ecsta PS71 SUV
60%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
68%
Rolling resistance
Kumho Ecsta PS71 SUV
60%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
85%

Performance spider chart

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Add to comparison

Popular brands
New comparison