18 Shops · 56,847+ Products

Comparison: Kumho Ecsta HS52 vs. Vredestein Quatrac

In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from South Korea (Kumho) against a tyre from a manufacturer from Holland (Vredestein). Generally, Kumho summer tyres are slightly better rated (59%) than Vredestein (34%). In this particular case, the Vredestein Quatrac has a better rating of 92% compared to 74% of the Kumho Ecsta HS52. The first tyre test of Kumho Ecsta HS52 was done in 2022, compared to 2020 when was the Vredestein Quatrac first tested.

Test Profile

Kumho
Ecsta HS52
Vredestein
Quatrac
Number of tests
10
16
Best position
#2
#1
Average position
6.0
3.1
Latest test
2026
2025
Available sizes
104
86

Wet

Wet
Kumho Ecsta HS52
77%
Vredestein Quatrac
87%
Wet braking
Kumho Ecsta HS52
80%
Vredestein Quatrac
86%
Aquaplaning - cross
Kumho Ecsta HS52
66%
Vredestein Quatrac
82%
Aquaplaning - longitudal
Kumho Ecsta HS52
73%
Vredestein Quatrac
84%
Wet circle cornering
Kumho Ecsta HS52
89%
Vredestein Quatrac
88%
Wet handling
Kumho Ecsta HS52
79%
Vredestein Quatrac
92%

Comfort

Comfort
Kumho Ecsta HS52
77%
Vredestein Quatrac
88%
Exterior noise
Kumho Ecsta HS52
73%
Vredestein Quatrac
86%
Comfort
Kumho Ecsta HS52
76%
Vredestein Quatrac
78%
Interior noise
Kumho Ecsta HS52
71%
Vredestein Quatrac
95%

Dry

Dry
Kumho Ecsta HS52
87%
Vredestein Quatrac
82%
Dry braking
Kumho Ecsta HS52
89%
Vredestein Quatrac
79%
Dry handling
Kumho Ecsta HS52
85%
Vredestein Quatrac
81%

Costs

Costs
Kumho Ecsta HS52
76%
Vredestein Quatrac
67%
Rolling resistance
Kumho Ecsta HS52
70%
Vredestein Quatrac
77%
Mileage
Kumho Ecsta HS52
79%
Vredestein Quatrac
56%
Price/value
Kumho Ecsta HS52
97%
Vredestein Quatrac
64%

Performance spider chart

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Add to comparison

Popular brands
New comparison