18 Shops · 56,847+ Products

Comparison: Kumho Ecsta HS52 vs. Toyo Proxes Comfort vs. Firestone Roadhawk 2

The Kumho Ecsta HS52 and the Toyo Proxes Comfort are two touring summer tyres that have notably fared well in our tests, hitting a percentage ranking of 81% and 72% respectively. Their strengths and weaknesses have been clear based on the data collected from a range of tyre tests, making it easier for shoppers to decide which is the best fit for their vehicle and driving requirements.


The Kumho Ecsta HS52, successor to the popular Kumho Ecsta HS51, has seemingly outperformed its predecessor. The tyre consistently shows strong results in both wet and dry conditions, ranking 3rd out of 51 tyres in the Autobild test. Its best features were noted as dry handling, dry braking, and wet braking, making it a reliable choice for drivers no matter the weather. However, criticisms were modest comfort and weaknesses in environmental performance and efficiency. More about Kumho.


On the other hand, the Toyo Proxes Comfort, manufactured in Japan by Toyo, has a significant following owing to its dynamic handling on both wet and dry surfaces as well as its quietness and reasonable price level. In the Autobild test, it landed a solid 9th place out of 51 tyres, with strong points being its dry handling and dry braking. However, criticisms were drawn towards its decreased lifespan and extended wet braking. In terms of mutual test positions, it generally positions lower than HS52, making it the less high-performing tyre of the two.


Given the data from all tests, it appears that while both the Kumho Ecsta HS52 and the Toyo Proxes Comfort have several strengths and weaknesses, the HS52 performs better overall. It bags higher ratings, performs better in tests, and offers a balanced performance with convincing driving features on both dry and wet surfaces compared to Toyo Proxes Comfort. The Toyo Proxes Comfort, though, may be the more affordable option for those looking to limit noise and provide a comfortable ride.


In conclusion, both tyres cater to different needs. The Kumho Ecsta HS52 seems fit for those looking for overall performance, while the Toyo Proxes Comfort could be a great pick for those prioritizing ride comfort and quietness over high-end performance.

Test Profile

Kumho
Ecsta HS52
Toyo
Proxes Comfort
Firestone
Roadhawk 2
Number of tests
10
16
6
Best position
#2
#5
#3
Average position
6.0
9.7
4.7
Latest test
2026
2025
2026
Available sizes
104
116
146

Wet

Wet
Kumho Ecsta HS52
77%
Toyo Proxes Comfort
63%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
86%
Aquaplaning - longitudal
Kumho Ecsta HS52
73%
Toyo Proxes Comfort
70%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
95%
Wet braking
Kumho Ecsta HS52
80%
Toyo Proxes Comfort
65%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
78%
Aquaplaning - cross
Kumho Ecsta HS52
66%
Toyo Proxes Comfort
70%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
88%
Wet handling
Kumho Ecsta HS52
79%
Toyo Proxes Comfort
72%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
88%
Wet circle cornering
Kumho Ecsta HS52
89%
Toyo Proxes Comfort
80%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
84%

Comfort

Comfort
Kumho Ecsta HS52
77%
Toyo Proxes Comfort
82%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
77%
Exterior noise
Kumho Ecsta HS52
73%
Toyo Proxes Comfort
74%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
66%
Comfort
Kumho Ecsta HS52
76%
Toyo Proxes Comfort
73%

Dry

Dry
Kumho Ecsta HS52
87%
Toyo Proxes Comfort
78%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
79%
Dry braking
Kumho Ecsta HS52
89%
Toyo Proxes Comfort
80%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
81%
Dry handling
Kumho Ecsta HS52
85%
Toyo Proxes Comfort
77%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
77%

Costs

Costs
Kumho Ecsta HS52
76%
Toyo Proxes Comfort
66%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
68%
Rolling resistance
Kumho Ecsta HS52
70%
Toyo Proxes Comfort
67%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
85%
Mileage
Kumho Ecsta HS52
79%
Toyo Proxes Comfort
63%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
38%
Price/value
Kumho Ecsta HS52
97%
Toyo Proxes Comfort
75%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
60%

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Add to comparison

Popular brands
New comparison