Comparison: Kumho Ecsta HS52 vs. Semperit Speed-Life vs. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 vs. Falken e.Ziex vs. GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+

Upper-middle

Kumho

Ecsta HS52

VS

Also compare with

PILOT ALPIN 5

SportContact 7

WinterContact TS 870

Test Profile

Ecsta HS52

Speed-Life

Efficientgrip Performance 2

e.Ziex

UltraGrip Performance+

Number of tests

10

—

3

23

Best position

#2

—

#2

#1

Average position

6.0

—

3.3

3.7

3.3

Latest test

2026

—

2026

2025

Available sizes

104

16

40

34

176

Wet

Kumho Ecsta HS52

77%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

77%

Falken e.Ziex

75%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+

83%

Wet braking

Kumho Ecsta HS52

80%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

78%

Falken e.Ziex

87%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+

80%

Aquaplaning - cross

Kumho Ecsta HS52

66%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

69%

Falken e.Ziex

61%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+

87%

Aquaplaning - longitudal

Kumho Ecsta HS52

73%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

66%

Falken e.Ziex

68%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+

83%

Wet circle cornering

Kumho Ecsta HS52

89%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

61%

Falken e.Ziex

77%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+

82%

Wet handling

Kumho Ecsta HS52

79%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

74%

Falken e.Ziex

69%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+

89%

Comfort

Kumho Ecsta HS52

77%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

70%

Falken e.Ziex

78%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+

84%

Exterior noise

Kumho Ecsta HS52

73%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

67%

Falken e.Ziex

78%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+

81%

Comfort

Kumho Ecsta HS52

76%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

90%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+

79%

Interior noise

Kumho Ecsta HS52

71%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

73%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+

91%

Dry

Kumho Ecsta HS52

87%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

75%

Falken e.Ziex

85%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+

78%

Dry braking

Kumho Ecsta HS52

89%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

77%

Falken e.Ziex

88%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+

84%

Dry handling

Kumho Ecsta HS52

85%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

77%

Falken e.Ziex

81%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+

81%

Costs

Kumho Ecsta HS52

76%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

83%

Falken e.Ziex

80%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+

80%

Rolling resistance

Kumho Ecsta HS52

70%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

72%

Falken e.Ziex

95%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+

80%

Mileage

Kumho Ecsta HS52

79%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

99%

Falken e.Ziex

60%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+

78%

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Comparison: Kumho Ecsta HS52 vs. Semperit Speed-Life vs. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 vs. Falken e.Ziex vs. GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+

Ecsta HS52

Speed-Life

Efficientgrip Performance 2

e.Ziex

UltraGrip Performance+

Test Profile

Wet

Comfort

Dry

Costs

Dimensions and prices

Add to comparison