18 Shops · 56,847+ Products

Comparison: Kumho Ecsta HS52 vs. Nokian WetProof vs. Falken e.Ziex

Test Profile

Kumho
Ecsta HS52
Nokian
WetProof
Falken
e.Ziex
Number of tests
10
14
3
Best position
#2
#1
#2
Average position
6.0
5.6
3.7
Latest test
2026
2023
2025
Available sizes
104
47
34

Wet

Wet
Kumho Ecsta HS52
77%
Nokian WetProof
84%
Falken e.Ziex
75%
Aquaplaning - cross
Kumho Ecsta HS52
66%
Nokian WetProof
72%
Falken e.Ziex
61%
Aquaplaning - longitudal
Kumho Ecsta HS52
73%
Nokian WetProof
81%
Falken e.Ziex
68%
Wet braking
Kumho Ecsta HS52
80%
Nokian WetProof
85%
Falken e.Ziex
87%
Wet circle cornering
Kumho Ecsta HS52
89%
Nokian WetProof
91%
Falken e.Ziex
77%
Wet handling
Kumho Ecsta HS52
79%
Nokian WetProof
86%
Falken e.Ziex
69%

Comfort

Comfort
Kumho Ecsta HS52
77%
Nokian WetProof
79%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Exterior noise
Kumho Ecsta HS52
73%
Nokian WetProof
86%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Comfort
Kumho Ecsta HS52
71%
Nokian WetProof
87%
Falken e.Ziex
78%

Dry

Dry
Kumho Ecsta HS52
87%
Nokian WetProof
78%
Falken e.Ziex
85%
Dry braking
Kumho Ecsta HS52
89%
Nokian WetProof
87%
Falken e.Ziex
88%
Dry handling
Kumho Ecsta HS52
85%
Nokian WetProof
80%
Falken e.Ziex
81%

Costs

Costs
Kumho Ecsta HS52
76%
Nokian WetProof
60%
Falken e.Ziex
80%
Rolling resistance
Kumho Ecsta HS52
70%
Nokian WetProof
61%
Falken e.Ziex
95%
Mileage
Kumho Ecsta HS52
79%
Nokian WetProof
56%
Falken e.Ziex
60%
Price/value
Kumho Ecsta HS52
97%
Nokian WetProof
46%
Falken e.Ziex
60%

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Add to comparison

Popular brands
New comparison