18 Shops · 56,847+ Products

Comparator | Contact Us

Comparison: Kumho Ecsta HS52 vs. Nokian Powerproof vs. Falken e.Ziex

Kumho Ecsta HS52

Kumho

Ecsta HS52

VS

Nokian Powerproof

Nokian

Powerproof

Falken e.Ziex

Falken

e.Ziex

Also compare with

PremiumContact 7

Pilot Sport 5

Test Profile

Kumho

Ecsta HS52

Nokian

Powerproof

Falken

e.Ziex

Number of tests

10

11

3

Best position

#2

#2

#2

Average position

6.0

7.5

3.7

Latest test

2026

2022

2025

Available sizes

104

53

34

Wet

Wet

Kumho Ecsta HS52

77%

Nokian Powerproof

80%

Falken e.Ziex

75%

Wet braking

Kumho Ecsta HS52

80%

Nokian Powerproof

79%

Falken e.Ziex

87%

Aquaplaning - cross

Kumho Ecsta HS52

66%

Nokian Powerproof

72%

Falken e.Ziex

61%

Aquaplaning - longitudal

Kumho Ecsta HS52

73%

Nokian Powerproof

81%

Falken e.Ziex

68%

Wet circle cornering

Kumho Ecsta HS52

89%

Nokian Powerproof

82%

Falken e.Ziex

77%

Wet handling

Kumho Ecsta HS52

79%

Nokian Powerproof

86%

Falken e.Ziex

69%

Comfort

Comfort

Kumho Ecsta HS52

77%

Nokian Powerproof

76%

Falken e.Ziex

78%

Exterior noise

Kumho Ecsta HS52

73%

Nokian Powerproof

64%

Falken e.Ziex

78%

Comfort

Kumho Ecsta HS52

76%

Nokian Powerproof

64%

Dry

Dry

Kumho Ecsta HS52

87%

Nokian Powerproof

83%

Falken e.Ziex

85%

Dry braking

Kumho Ecsta HS52

89%

Nokian Powerproof

88%

Falken e.Ziex

88%

Dry handling

Kumho Ecsta HS52

85%

Nokian Powerproof

84%

Falken e.Ziex

81%

Costs

Costs

Kumho Ecsta HS52

76%

Nokian Powerproof

65%

Falken e.Ziex

80%

Rolling resistance

Kumho Ecsta HS52

70%

Nokian Powerproof

70%

Falken e.Ziex

95%

Mileage

Kumho Ecsta HS52

79%

Nokian Powerproof

54%

Falken e.Ziex

60%

Price/value

Kumho Ecsta HS52

97%

Nokian Powerproof

50%

Falken e.Ziex

60%

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Add to comparison