18 Shops · 56,847+ Products

Comparison: Kumho Ecsta HS52 vs. Nokian Powerproof

In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from South Korea (Kumho) against a tyre from a manufacturer from Finland (Nokian). Generally, Nokian summer tyres are slightly better rated (60%) than Kumho (59%). The first tyre test of Kumho Ecsta HS52 was done in 2022, compared to 2019 when was the Nokian Powerproof first tested. Important for this comparison is also the Autobild 2022 215/55 R17 test, where both the Ecsta HS52 and the Powerproof were tested. See more mutual tests below. When it comes to comparison, eu labels can be also interesting - 75% of Kumho Ecsta HS52 dimensions has A wet grip rating. Most (100%) of the Nokian Powerproof also have A wet ratings.

Test Profile

Kumho
Ecsta HS52
Nokian
Powerproof
Number of tests
10
11
Best position
#2
#2
Average position
6.0
7.5
Latest test
2026
2022
Available sizes
104
53

Wet

Wet
Kumho Ecsta HS52
77%
Nokian Powerproof
80%

Comfort

Comfort
Kumho Ecsta HS52
77%
Nokian Powerproof
76%

Dry

Dry
Kumho Ecsta HS52
87%
Nokian Powerproof
83%

Costs

Costs
Kumho Ecsta HS52
76%
Nokian Powerproof
65%

Performance spider chart

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Mutual Tests Available
These tyres were tested together in 2 test(s). Click to view detailed head-to-head results.

Mutual tests

OrganizationSeasonYearDimension
AutobildAutobild
Summer
2022215/55 R17View
AutobildAutobild
Summer
2022215/55 R17View

Add to comparison

Popular brands
New comparison