18 Shops · 56,847+ Products

Comparison: Kumho Ecsta HS52 vs. Michelin Primacy 5 vs. Michelin e.Primacy vs. Falken e.Ziex

Test Profile

Kumho
Ecsta HS52
Michelin
Primacy 5
Michelin
e.Primacy
Falken
e.Ziex
Number of tests
10
3
4
3
Best position
#2
#1
#3
#2
Average position
6.0
4.7
12.0
3.7
Latest test
2026
2026
2025
2025
Available sizes
104
126
111
34

Wet

Wet
Kumho Ecsta HS52
77%
Michelin Primacy 5
58%
Michelin e.Primacy
61%
Falken e.Ziex
75%
Aquaplaning - cross
Kumho Ecsta HS52
66%
Michelin e.Primacy
65%
Falken e.Ziex
61%
Aquaplaning - longitudal
Kumho Ecsta HS52
73%
Michelin Primacy 5
51%
Michelin e.Primacy
65%
Falken e.Ziex
68%
Wet braking
Kumho Ecsta HS52
80%
Michelin Primacy 5
65%
Michelin e.Primacy
62%
Falken e.Ziex
87%
Wet handling
Kumho Ecsta HS52
79%
Michelin e.Primacy
52%
Falken e.Ziex
69%
Wet circle cornering
Kumho Ecsta HS52
89%
Michelin e.Primacy
52%
Falken e.Ziex
77%

Comfort

Comfort
Kumho Ecsta HS52
77%
Michelin Primacy 5
1%
Michelin e.Primacy
62%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Exterior noise
Kumho Ecsta HS52
73%
Michelin e.Primacy
70%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Comfort
Kumho Ecsta HS52
71%
Michelin e.Primacy
54%
Falken e.Ziex
78%

Dry

Dry
Kumho Ecsta HS52
87%
Michelin Primacy 5
73%
Michelin e.Primacy
74%
Falken e.Ziex
85%
Dry braking
Kumho Ecsta HS52
89%
Michelin Primacy 5
76%
Michelin e.Primacy
63%
Falken e.Ziex
88%
Dry handling
Kumho Ecsta HS52
85%
Michelin Primacy 5
69%
Michelin e.Primacy
80%
Falken e.Ziex
81%

Costs

Costs
Kumho Ecsta HS52
76%
Michelin Primacy 5
63%
Michelin e.Primacy
81%
Falken e.Ziex
80%
Rolling resistance
Kumho Ecsta HS52
70%
Michelin Primacy 5
63%
Michelin e.Primacy
67%
Falken e.Ziex
95%
Mileage
Kumho Ecsta HS52
79%
Michelin e.Primacy
100%
Falken e.Ziex
60%

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Add to comparison

Popular brands
New comparison