18 Shops · 56,847+ Products

Comparison: Kumho Ecsta HS52 vs. Michelin PILOT ALPIN 5 vs. Falken e.Ziex

Test Profile

Kumho
Ecsta HS52
Michelin
PILOT ALPIN 5
Falken
e.Ziex
Number of tests
10
21
3
Best position
#2
#1
#2
Average position
6.0
1.7
3.7
Latest test
2026
2025
2025
Available sizes
104
133
34

Wet

Wet
Kumho Ecsta HS52
77%
Michelin PILOT ALPIN 5
72%
Falken e.Ziex
75%
Wet braking
Kumho Ecsta HS52
80%
Michelin PILOT ALPIN 5
74%
Falken e.Ziex
87%
Aquaplaning - cross
Kumho Ecsta HS52
66%
Michelin PILOT ALPIN 5
60%
Falken e.Ziex
61%
Aquaplaning - longitudal
Kumho Ecsta HS52
73%
Michelin PILOT ALPIN 5
69%
Falken e.Ziex
68%
Wet circle cornering
Kumho Ecsta HS52
89%
Michelin PILOT ALPIN 5
77%
Falken e.Ziex
77%
Wet handling
Kumho Ecsta HS52
79%
Michelin PILOT ALPIN 5
86%
Falken e.Ziex
69%

Comfort

Comfort
Kumho Ecsta HS52
77%
Michelin PILOT ALPIN 5
79%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Exterior noise
Kumho Ecsta HS52
73%
Michelin PILOT ALPIN 5
89%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Comfort
Kumho Ecsta HS52
76%
Michelin PILOT ALPIN 5
79%

Dry

Dry
Kumho Ecsta HS52
87%
Michelin PILOT ALPIN 5
86%
Falken e.Ziex
85%
Dry braking
Kumho Ecsta HS52
89%
Michelin PILOT ALPIN 5
80%
Falken e.Ziex
88%
Dry handling
Kumho Ecsta HS52
85%
Michelin PILOT ALPIN 5
90%
Falken e.Ziex
81%
Dry performance
Kumho Ecsta HS52
72%
Michelin PILOT ALPIN 5
68%

Costs

Costs
Kumho Ecsta HS52
76%
Michelin PILOT ALPIN 5
76%
Falken e.Ziex
80%
Rolling resistance
Kumho Ecsta HS52
70%
Michelin PILOT ALPIN 5
79%
Falken e.Ziex
95%
Mileage
Kumho Ecsta HS52
79%
Michelin PILOT ALPIN 5
55%
Falken e.Ziex
60%
Price/value
Kumho Ecsta HS52
97%
Michelin PILOT ALPIN 5
53%
Falken e.Ziex
60%

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Add to comparison

Popular brands
New comparison