18 Shops · 56,847+ Products

Comparison: Kumho Ecsta HS52 vs. Michelin e.Primacy vs. Pirelli P ZERO PZ4 vs. Falken e.Ziex

Test Profile

Kumho
Ecsta HS52
Michelin
e.Primacy
Pirelli
P ZERO PZ4
Falken
e.Ziex
Number of tests
10
4
14
3
Best position
#2
#3
#2
#2
Average position
6.0
12.0
5.5
3.7
Latest test
2026
2025
2025
2025
Available sizes
104
111
706
34

Wet

Wet
Kumho Ecsta HS52
77%
Michelin e.Primacy
61%
Pirelli P ZERO PZ4
83%
Falken e.Ziex
75%
Aquaplaning - longitudal
Kumho Ecsta HS52
73%
Michelin e.Primacy
65%
Pirelli P ZERO PZ4
76%
Falken e.Ziex
68%
Wet braking
Kumho Ecsta HS52
80%
Michelin e.Primacy
62%
Pirelli P ZERO PZ4
78%
Falken e.Ziex
87%
Aquaplaning - cross
Kumho Ecsta HS52
66%
Michelin e.Primacy
65%
Pirelli P ZERO PZ4
68%
Falken e.Ziex
61%
Wet handling
Kumho Ecsta HS52
79%
Michelin e.Primacy
52%
Pirelli P ZERO PZ4
90%
Falken e.Ziex
69%
Wet circle cornering
Kumho Ecsta HS52
89%
Michelin e.Primacy
52%
Pirelli P ZERO PZ4
89%
Falken e.Ziex
77%

Comfort

Comfort
Kumho Ecsta HS52
77%
Michelin e.Primacy
62%
Pirelli P ZERO PZ4
75%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Exterior noise
Kumho Ecsta HS52
73%
Michelin e.Primacy
70%
Pirelli P ZERO PZ4
77%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Comfort
Kumho Ecsta HS52
71%
Michelin e.Primacy
54%
Pirelli P ZERO PZ4
74%
Falken e.Ziex
78%

Dry

Dry
Kumho Ecsta HS52
87%
Michelin e.Primacy
74%
Pirelli P ZERO PZ4
77%
Falken e.Ziex
85%
Dry braking
Kumho Ecsta HS52
89%
Michelin e.Primacy
63%
Pirelli P ZERO PZ4
80%
Falken e.Ziex
88%
Dry handling
Kumho Ecsta HS52
85%
Michelin e.Primacy
80%
Pirelli P ZERO PZ4
82%
Falken e.Ziex
81%

Costs

Costs
Kumho Ecsta HS52
76%
Michelin e.Primacy
81%
Pirelli P ZERO PZ4
52%
Falken e.Ziex
80%
Rolling resistance
Kumho Ecsta HS52
70%
Michelin e.Primacy
67%
Pirelli P ZERO PZ4
59%
Falken e.Ziex
95%
Mileage
Kumho Ecsta HS52
79%
Michelin e.Primacy
100%
Pirelli P ZERO PZ4
49%
Falken e.Ziex
60%

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Add to comparison

Popular brands
New comparison