18 Shops · 56,847+ Products

Comparison: Kumho Ecsta HS52 vs. Michelin e.Primacy vs. Hankook Ventus Evo vs. Falken e.Ziex

Test Profile

Kumho
Ecsta HS52
Michelin
e.Primacy
Hankook
Ventus Evo
Falken
e.Ziex
Number of tests
10
4
3
3
Best position
#2
#3
#2
#2
Average position
6.0
12.0
3.3
3.7
Latest test
2026
2025
2026
2025
Available sizes
104
111
60
34

Wet

Wet
Kumho Ecsta HS52
77%
Michelin e.Primacy
61%
Hankook Ventus Evo
87%
Falken e.Ziex
75%
Aquaplaning - cross
Kumho Ecsta HS52
66%
Michelin e.Primacy
65%
Hankook Ventus Evo
71%
Falken e.Ziex
61%
Aquaplaning - longitudal
Kumho Ecsta HS52
73%
Michelin e.Primacy
65%
Hankook Ventus Evo
81%
Falken e.Ziex
68%
Wet braking
Kumho Ecsta HS52
80%
Michelin e.Primacy
62%
Hankook Ventus Evo
95%
Falken e.Ziex
87%
Wet circle cornering
Kumho Ecsta HS52
89%
Michelin e.Primacy
52%
Hankook Ventus Evo
96%
Falken e.Ziex
77%
Wet handling
Kumho Ecsta HS52
79%
Michelin e.Primacy
52%
Hankook Ventus Evo
87%
Falken e.Ziex
69%

Comfort

Comfort
Kumho Ecsta HS52
77%
Michelin e.Primacy
62%
Hankook Ventus Evo
75%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Exterior noise
Kumho Ecsta HS52
73%
Michelin e.Primacy
70%
Hankook Ventus Evo
73%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Comfort
Kumho Ecsta HS52
71%
Michelin e.Primacy
54%
Hankook Ventus Evo
76%
Falken e.Ziex
78%

Dry

Dry
Kumho Ecsta HS52
87%
Michelin e.Primacy
74%
Hankook Ventus Evo
83%
Falken e.Ziex
85%
Dry braking
Kumho Ecsta HS52
89%
Michelin e.Primacy
63%
Hankook Ventus Evo
76%
Falken e.Ziex
88%
Dry handling
Kumho Ecsta HS52
85%
Michelin e.Primacy
80%
Hankook Ventus Evo
90%
Falken e.Ziex
81%

Costs

Costs
Kumho Ecsta HS52
76%
Michelin e.Primacy
81%
Hankook Ventus Evo
80%
Falken e.Ziex
80%
Rolling resistance
Kumho Ecsta HS52
70%
Michelin e.Primacy
67%
Hankook Ventus Evo
86%
Falken e.Ziex
95%
Mileage
Kumho Ecsta HS52
79%
Michelin e.Primacy
100%
Hankook Ventus Evo
71%
Falken e.Ziex
60%

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Add to comparison

Popular brands
New comparison