18 Shops · 56,847+ Products

Comparison: Kumho Ecsta HS52 vs. Michelin e.Primacy vs. Hankook ION Evo vs. Pirelli P ZERO PZ4

Test Profile

Kumho
Ecsta HS52
Michelin
e.Primacy
Hankook
ION Evo
Pirelli
P ZERO PZ4
Number of tests
10
4
1
14
Best position
#2
#3
#1
#2
Average position
6.0
12.0
1.0
5.5
Latest test
2026
2025
2025
2025
Available sizes
104
111
64
706

Wet

Wet
Kumho Ecsta HS52
77%
Michelin e.Primacy
61%
Hankook ION Evo
89%
Pirelli P ZERO PZ4
83%
Aquaplaning - cross
Kumho Ecsta HS52
66%
Michelin e.Primacy
65%
Hankook ION Evo
87%
Pirelli P ZERO PZ4
68%
Aquaplaning - longitudal
Kumho Ecsta HS52
73%
Michelin e.Primacy
65%
Hankook ION Evo
77%
Pirelli P ZERO PZ4
76%
Wet braking
Kumho Ecsta HS52
80%
Michelin e.Primacy
62%
Hankook ION Evo
97%
Pirelli P ZERO PZ4
78%
Wet circle cornering
Kumho Ecsta HS52
89%
Michelin e.Primacy
52%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
Pirelli P ZERO PZ4
89%
Wet handling
Kumho Ecsta HS52
79%
Michelin e.Primacy
52%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
Pirelli P ZERO PZ4
90%

Comfort

Comfort
Kumho Ecsta HS52
77%
Michelin e.Primacy
62%
Hankook ION Evo
72%
Pirelli P ZERO PZ4
75%
Exterior noise
Kumho Ecsta HS52
73%
Michelin e.Primacy
70%
Hankook ION Evo
66%
Pirelli P ZERO PZ4
77%
Comfort
Kumho Ecsta HS52
71%
Michelin e.Primacy
54%
Hankook ION Evo
78%
Pirelli P ZERO PZ4
74%

Dry

Dry
Kumho Ecsta HS52
87%
Michelin e.Primacy
74%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
Pirelli P ZERO PZ4
77%
Dry braking
Kumho Ecsta HS52
89%
Michelin e.Primacy
63%
Hankook ION Evo
91%
Pirelli P ZERO PZ4
80%
Dry handling
Kumho Ecsta HS52
85%
Michelin e.Primacy
80%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
Pirelli P ZERO PZ4
82%

Costs

Costs
Kumho Ecsta HS52
76%
Michelin e.Primacy
81%
Hankook ION Evo
71%
Pirelli P ZERO PZ4
52%
Rolling resistance
Kumho Ecsta HS52
70%
Michelin e.Primacy
67%
Hankook ION Evo
69%
Pirelli P ZERO PZ4
59%
Mileage
Kumho Ecsta HS52
79%
Michelin e.Primacy
100%
Hankook ION Evo
82%
Pirelli P ZERO PZ4
49%

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Add to comparison

Popular brands
New comparison