Comparison: Kumho Ecsta HS52 vs. Michelin e.Primacy vs. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 vs. Hankook Ventus Evo vs. Falken e.Ziex

Upper-middle

Kumho

Ecsta HS52

VS

Also compare with

SportContact 7

Ventus Evo

PremiumContact 7

Test Profile

Ecsta HS52

e.Primacy

Efficientgrip Performance 2

Ventus Evo

e.Ziex

Number of tests

10

4

3

Best position

#2

#3

#2

Average position

6.0

12.0

3.3

3.7

Latest test

2026

2025

2026

2025

Available sizes

104

111

40

60

34

Wet

Kumho Ecsta HS52

77%

Michelin e.Primacy

61%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

77%

Hankook Ventus Evo

87%

Falken e.Ziex

75%

Aquaplaning - cross

Kumho Ecsta HS52

66%

Michelin e.Primacy

65%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

69%

Hankook Ventus Evo

71%

Falken e.Ziex

61%

Aquaplaning - longitudal

Kumho Ecsta HS52

73%

Michelin e.Primacy

65%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

66%

Hankook Ventus Evo

81%

Falken e.Ziex

68%

Wet braking

Kumho Ecsta HS52

80%

Michelin e.Primacy

62%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

78%

Hankook Ventus Evo

95%

Falken e.Ziex

87%

Wet circle cornering

Kumho Ecsta HS52

89%

Michelin e.Primacy

52%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

61%

Hankook Ventus Evo

96%

Falken e.Ziex

77%

Wet handling

Kumho Ecsta HS52

79%

Michelin e.Primacy

52%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

74%

Hankook Ventus Evo

87%

Falken e.Ziex

69%

Comfort

Kumho Ecsta HS52

77%

Michelin e.Primacy

62%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

70%

Hankook Ventus Evo

75%

Falken e.Ziex

78%

Exterior noise

Kumho Ecsta HS52

73%

Michelin e.Primacy

70%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

67%

Hankook Ventus Evo

73%

Falken e.Ziex

78%

Comfort

Kumho Ecsta HS52

71%

Michelin e.Primacy

54%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

59%

Hankook Ventus Evo

76%

Falken e.Ziex

78%

Dry

Kumho Ecsta HS52

87%

Michelin e.Primacy

74%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

75%

Hankook Ventus Evo

83%

Falken e.Ziex

85%

Dry braking

Kumho Ecsta HS52

89%

Michelin e.Primacy

63%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

77%

Hankook Ventus Evo

76%

Falken e.Ziex

88%

Dry handling

Kumho Ecsta HS52

85%

Michelin e.Primacy

80%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

77%

Hankook Ventus Evo

90%

Falken e.Ziex

81%

Costs

Kumho Ecsta HS52

76%

Michelin e.Primacy

81%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

83%

Hankook Ventus Evo

80%

Falken e.Ziex

80%

Rolling resistance

Kumho Ecsta HS52

70%

Michelin e.Primacy

67%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

72%

Hankook Ventus Evo

86%

Falken e.Ziex

95%

Mileage

Kumho Ecsta HS52

79%

Michelin e.Primacy

100%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

99%

Hankook Ventus Evo

71%

Falken e.Ziex

60%

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Comparison: Kumho Ecsta HS52 vs. Michelin e.Primacy vs. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 vs. Hankook Ventus Evo vs. Falken e.Ziex

Ecsta HS52

e.Primacy

Efficientgrip Performance 2

Ventus Evo

e.Ziex

Test Profile

Wet

Comfort

Dry

Costs

Dimensions and prices

Add to comparison