Comparison: Kumho Ecsta HS52 vs. Michelin e.Primacy vs. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 vs. Falken e.Ziex vs. Pirelli P ZERO PZ4 vs. Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

Upper-middle

Kumho

Ecsta HS52

VS

Also compare with

SportContact 7

Ventus Evo

PremiumContact 7

Test Profile

Ecsta HS52

e.Primacy

Efficientgrip Performance 2

e.Ziex

P ZERO PZ4

Efficientgrip 2 SUV

Number of tests

10

4

3

14

5

Best position

#2

#3

#2

#1

Average position

6.0

12.0

3.3

3.7

5.5

2.2

Latest test

2026

2025

2026

2025

Available sizes

104

111

40

34

706

63

Wet

Kumho Ecsta HS52

77%

Michelin e.Primacy

61%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

77%

Falken e.Ziex

75%

Pirelli P ZERO PZ4

83%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

83%

Aquaplaning - cross

Kumho Ecsta HS52

66%

Michelin e.Primacy

65%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

69%

Falken e.Ziex

61%

Pirelli P ZERO PZ4

68%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

82%

Aquaplaning - longitudal

Kumho Ecsta HS52

73%

Michelin e.Primacy

65%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

66%

Falken e.Ziex

68%

Pirelli P ZERO PZ4

76%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

78%

Wet braking

Kumho Ecsta HS52

80%

Michelin e.Primacy

62%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

78%

Falken e.Ziex

87%

Pirelli P ZERO PZ4

78%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

85%

Wet circle cornering

Kumho Ecsta HS52

89%

Michelin e.Primacy

52%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

61%

Falken e.Ziex

77%

Pirelli P ZERO PZ4

89%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

79%

Wet handling

Kumho Ecsta HS52

79%

Michelin e.Primacy

52%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

74%

Falken e.Ziex

69%

Pirelli P ZERO PZ4

90%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

86%

Comfort

Kumho Ecsta HS52

77%

Michelin e.Primacy

62%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

70%

Falken e.Ziex

78%

Pirelli P ZERO PZ4

75%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

92%

Exterior noise

Kumho Ecsta HS52

73%

Michelin e.Primacy

70%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

67%

Falken e.Ziex

78%

Pirelli P ZERO PZ4

77%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

90%

Comfort

Kumho Ecsta HS52

71%

Michelin e.Primacy

54%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

59%

Falken e.Ziex

78%

Pirelli P ZERO PZ4

74%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

83%

Dry

Kumho Ecsta HS52

87%

Michelin e.Primacy

74%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

75%

Falken e.Ziex

85%

Pirelli P ZERO PZ4

77%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

83%

Dry braking

Kumho Ecsta HS52

89%

Michelin e.Primacy

63%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

77%

Falken e.Ziex

88%

Pirelli P ZERO PZ4

80%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

82%

Dry handling

Kumho Ecsta HS52

85%

Michelin e.Primacy

80%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

77%

Falken e.Ziex

81%

Pirelli P ZERO PZ4

82%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

84%

Costs

Kumho Ecsta HS52

76%

Michelin e.Primacy

81%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

83%

Falken e.Ziex

80%

Pirelli P ZERO PZ4

52%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

84%

Rolling resistance

Kumho Ecsta HS52

70%

Michelin e.Primacy

67%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

72%

Falken e.Ziex

95%

Pirelli P ZERO PZ4

59%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

77%

Mileage

Kumho Ecsta HS52

79%

Michelin e.Primacy

100%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

99%

Falken e.Ziex

60%

Pirelli P ZERO PZ4

49%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

96%

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Comparison: Kumho Ecsta HS52 vs. Michelin e.Primacy vs. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 vs. Falken e.Ziex vs. Pirelli P ZERO PZ4 vs. Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

Ecsta HS52

e.Primacy

Efficientgrip Performance 2

e.Ziex

P ZERO PZ4

Efficientgrip 2 SUV

Test Profile

Wet

Comfort

Dry

Costs

Dimensions and prices

Add to comparison