Comparison: Kumho Ecsta HS52 vs. Michelin e.Primacy vs. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 vs. Bridgestone Turanza T005 vs. Falken e.Ziex

Upper-middle

Kumho

Ecsta HS52

VS

Also compare with

SportContact 7

PremiumContact 7

Pilot Sport 5

Test Profile

Ecsta HS52

e.Primacy

Efficientgrip Performance 2

Turanza T005

e.Ziex

Number of tests

10

4

3

33

3

Best position

#2

#3

#2

#1

#2

Average position

6.0

12.0

3.3

4.1

3.7

Latest test

2026

2025

2026

2025

Available sizes

104

111

40

658

34

Wet

Kumho Ecsta HS52

77%

Michelin e.Primacy

61%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

77%

Bridgestone Turanza T005

82%

Falken e.Ziex

75%

Wet braking

Kumho Ecsta HS52

80%

Michelin e.Primacy

62%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

78%

Bridgestone Turanza T005

78%

Falken e.Ziex

87%

Aquaplaning - cross

Kumho Ecsta HS52

66%

Michelin e.Primacy

65%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

69%

Bridgestone Turanza T005

73%

Falken e.Ziex

61%

Aquaplaning - longitudal

Kumho Ecsta HS52

73%

Michelin e.Primacy

65%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

66%

Bridgestone Turanza T005

78%

Falken e.Ziex

68%

Wet circle cornering

Kumho Ecsta HS52

89%

Michelin e.Primacy

52%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

61%

Bridgestone Turanza T005

85%

Falken e.Ziex

77%

Wet handling

Kumho Ecsta HS52

79%

Michelin e.Primacy

52%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

74%

Bridgestone Turanza T005

87%

Falken e.Ziex

69%

Wet performance

Kumho Ecsta HS52

55%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

75%

Bridgestone Turanza T005

82%

Comfort

Kumho Ecsta HS52

77%

Michelin e.Primacy

62%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

70%

Bridgestone Turanza T005

76%

Falken e.Ziex

78%

Exterior noise

Kumho Ecsta HS52

73%

Michelin e.Primacy

70%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

67%

Bridgestone Turanza T005

62%

Falken e.Ziex

78%

Comfort

Kumho Ecsta HS52

76%

Michelin e.Primacy

70%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

90%

Bridgestone Turanza T005

66%

Interior noise

Kumho Ecsta HS52

71%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

73%

Bridgestone Turanza T005

83%

Dry

Kumho Ecsta HS52

87%

Michelin e.Primacy

74%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

75%

Bridgestone Turanza T005

83%

Falken e.Ziex

85%

Dry braking

Kumho Ecsta HS52

89%

Michelin e.Primacy

63%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

77%

Bridgestone Turanza T005

87%

Falken e.Ziex

88%

Dry handling

Kumho Ecsta HS52

85%

Michelin e.Primacy

80%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

77%

Bridgestone Turanza T005

87%

Falken e.Ziex

81%

Dry performance

Kumho Ecsta HS52

72%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

64%

Bridgestone Turanza T005

83%

Costs

Kumho Ecsta HS52

76%

Michelin e.Primacy

81%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

83%

Bridgestone Turanza T005

81%

Falken e.Ziex

80%

Rolling resistance

Kumho Ecsta HS52

70%

Michelin e.Primacy

67%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

72%

Bridgestone Turanza T005

93%

Falken e.Ziex

95%

Mileage

Kumho Ecsta HS52

79%

Michelin e.Primacy

100%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

99%

Bridgestone Turanza T005

69%

Falken e.Ziex

60%

Price/value

Kumho Ecsta HS52

97%

Bridgestone Turanza T005

53%

Falken e.Ziex

60%

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Comparison: Kumho Ecsta HS52 vs. Michelin e.Primacy vs. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 vs. Bridgestone Turanza T005 vs. Falken e.Ziex

Ecsta HS52

e.Primacy

Efficientgrip Performance 2

Turanza T005

e.Ziex

Test Profile

Wet

Comfort

Dry

Costs

Dimensions and prices

Add to comparison