18 Shops · 56,847+ Products

Comparison: Kumho Ecsta HS52 vs. Michelin e.Primacy vs. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance vs. Falken e.Ziex vs. Hankook ION Evo

Test Profile

Kumho
Ecsta HS52
Michelin
e.Primacy
Goodyear
Efficient Grip Performance
Falken
e.Ziex
Hankook
ION Evo
Number of tests
10
4
16
3
1
Best position
#2
#3
#3
#2
#1
Average position
6.0
12.0
5.5
3.7
1.0
Latest test
2026
2025
2023
2025
2025
Available sizes
104
111
153
34
64

Wet

Wet
Kumho Ecsta HS52
77%
Michelin e.Primacy
61%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
81%
Falken e.Ziex
75%
Hankook ION Evo
89%
Aquaplaning - longitudal
Kumho Ecsta HS52
73%
Michelin e.Primacy
65%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
86%
Falken e.Ziex
68%
Hankook ION Evo
77%
Wet braking
Kumho Ecsta HS52
80%
Michelin e.Primacy
62%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
76%
Falken e.Ziex
87%
Hankook ION Evo
97%
Aquaplaning - cross
Kumho Ecsta HS52
66%
Michelin e.Primacy
65%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
89%
Falken e.Ziex
61%
Hankook ION Evo
87%
Wet handling
Kumho Ecsta HS52
79%
Michelin e.Primacy
52%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
87%
Falken e.Ziex
69%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
Wet circle cornering
Kumho Ecsta HS52
89%
Michelin e.Primacy
52%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
81%
Falken e.Ziex
77%
Hankook ION Evo
92%

Comfort

Comfort
Kumho Ecsta HS52
77%
Michelin e.Primacy
62%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
77%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Hankook ION Evo
72%
Exterior noise
Kumho Ecsta HS52
73%
Michelin e.Primacy
70%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
75%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Hankook ION Evo
66%
Comfort
Kumho Ecsta HS52
71%
Michelin e.Primacy
54%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
91%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Hankook ION Evo
78%

Dry

Dry
Kumho Ecsta HS52
87%
Michelin e.Primacy
74%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
83%
Falken e.Ziex
85%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
Dry braking
Kumho Ecsta HS52
89%
Michelin e.Primacy
63%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
83%
Falken e.Ziex
88%
Hankook ION Evo
91%
Dry handling
Kumho Ecsta HS52
85%
Michelin e.Primacy
80%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
93%
Falken e.Ziex
81%
Hankook ION Evo
92%

Costs

Costs
Kumho Ecsta HS52
76%
Michelin e.Primacy
81%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
73%
Falken e.Ziex
80%
Hankook ION Evo
71%
Rolling resistance
Kumho Ecsta HS52
70%
Michelin e.Primacy
67%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
86%
Falken e.Ziex
95%
Hankook ION Evo
69%
Mileage
Kumho Ecsta HS52
79%
Michelin e.Primacy
100%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
64%
Falken e.Ziex
60%
Hankook ION Evo
82%

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Add to comparison

Popular brands
New comparison