18 Shops · 56,847+ Products

Comparison: Kumho Ecsta HS52 vs. Michelin e.Primacy vs. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 vs. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 vs. Hankook ION Evo vs. Falken e.Ziex

Test Profile

Kumho
Ecsta HS52
Michelin
e.Primacy
Goodyear
Efficient Grip Performance 2
GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2
Hankook
ION Evo
Falken
e.Ziex
Number of tests
10
4
18
3
1
3
Best position
#2
#3
#1
#2
#1
#2
Average position
6.0
12.0
6.1
3.3
1.0
3.7
Latest test
2026
2025
2024
2026
2025
2025
Available sizes
104
111
47
40
64
34

Wet

Wet
Kumho Ecsta HS52
77%
Michelin e.Primacy
61%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
76%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
77%
Hankook ION Evo
89%
Falken e.Ziex
75%
Wet braking
Kumho Ecsta HS52
80%
Michelin e.Primacy
62%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
72%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
78%
Hankook ION Evo
97%
Falken e.Ziex
87%
Aquaplaning - cross
Kumho Ecsta HS52
66%
Michelin e.Primacy
65%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
73%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
69%
Hankook ION Evo
87%
Falken e.Ziex
61%
Aquaplaning - longitudal
Kumho Ecsta HS52
73%
Michelin e.Primacy
65%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
69%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
66%
Hankook ION Evo
77%
Falken e.Ziex
68%
Wet circle cornering
Kumho Ecsta HS52
89%
Michelin e.Primacy
52%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
89%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
61%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
Falken e.Ziex
77%
Wet handling
Kumho Ecsta HS52
79%
Michelin e.Primacy
52%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
75%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
74%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
Falken e.Ziex
69%

Comfort

Comfort
Kumho Ecsta HS52
77%
Michelin e.Primacy
62%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
76%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
70%
Hankook ION Evo
72%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Exterior noise
Kumho Ecsta HS52
73%
Michelin e.Primacy
70%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
75%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
67%
Hankook ION Evo
66%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Comfort
Kumho Ecsta HS52
76%
Michelin e.Primacy
70%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
90%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
90%

Dry

Dry
Kumho Ecsta HS52
87%
Michelin e.Primacy
74%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
75%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
75%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
Falken e.Ziex
85%
Dry braking
Kumho Ecsta HS52
89%
Michelin e.Primacy
63%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
73%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
77%
Hankook ION Evo
91%
Falken e.Ziex
88%
Dry handling
Kumho Ecsta HS52
85%
Michelin e.Primacy
80%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
73%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
77%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
Falken e.Ziex
81%

Costs

Costs
Kumho Ecsta HS52
76%
Michelin e.Primacy
81%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
91%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
83%
Hankook ION Evo
71%
Falken e.Ziex
80%
Rolling resistance
Kumho Ecsta HS52
70%
Michelin e.Primacy
67%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
84%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
72%
Hankook ION Evo
69%
Falken e.Ziex
95%
Mileage
Kumho Ecsta HS52
79%
Michelin e.Primacy
100%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
100%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
99%
Hankook ION Evo
82%
Falken e.Ziex
60%

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Add to comparison

Popular brands
New comparison