18 Shops · 56,847+ Products

Comparator | Contact Us

Comparison: Kumho Ecsta HS52 vs. Michelin e.Primacy vs. Falken e.Ziex

Kumho Ecsta HS52

Kumho

Ecsta HS52

VS

Michelin e.Primacy

Michelin

e.Primacy

Falken e.Ziex

Falken

e.Ziex

Also compare with

PremiumContact 7

UltraContact NXT

Test Profile

Kumho

Ecsta HS52

Michelin

e.Primacy

Falken

e.Ziex

Number of tests

10

4

3

Best position

#2

#3

#2

Average position

6.0

12.0

3.7

Latest test

2026

2025

2025

Available sizes

104

111

34

Wet

Wet

Kumho Ecsta HS52

77%

Michelin e.Primacy

61%

Falken e.Ziex

75%

Wet braking

Kumho Ecsta HS52

80%

Michelin e.Primacy

62%

Falken e.Ziex

87%

Aquaplaning - cross

Kumho Ecsta HS52

66%

Michelin e.Primacy

65%

Falken e.Ziex

61%

Aquaplaning - longitudal

Kumho Ecsta HS52

73%

Michelin e.Primacy

65%

Falken e.Ziex

68%

Wet circle cornering

Kumho Ecsta HS52

89%

Michelin e.Primacy

52%

Falken e.Ziex

77%

Wet handling

Kumho Ecsta HS52

79%

Michelin e.Primacy

52%

Falken e.Ziex

69%

Comfort

Comfort

Kumho Ecsta HS52

77%

Michelin e.Primacy

62%

Falken e.Ziex

78%

Exterior noise

Kumho Ecsta HS52

73%

Michelin e.Primacy

70%

Falken e.Ziex

78%

Comfort

Kumho Ecsta HS52

71%

Michelin e.Primacy

54%

Falken e.Ziex

78%

Dry

Dry

Kumho Ecsta HS52

87%

Michelin e.Primacy

74%

Falken e.Ziex

85%

Dry braking

Kumho Ecsta HS52

89%

Michelin e.Primacy

63%

Falken e.Ziex

88%

Dry handling

Kumho Ecsta HS52

85%

Michelin e.Primacy

80%

Falken e.Ziex

81%

Costs

Costs

Kumho Ecsta HS52

76%

Michelin e.Primacy

81%

Falken e.Ziex

80%

Rolling resistance

Kumho Ecsta HS52

70%

Michelin e.Primacy

67%

Falken e.Ziex

95%

Mileage

Kumho Ecsta HS52

79%

Michelin e.Primacy

100%

Falken e.Ziex

60%

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Add to comparison