18 Shops · 56,847+ Products

Comparison: Kumho Ecsta HS52 vs. Hankook ION FlexClimate vs. Michelin CrossClimate 2

Test Profile

Kumho
Ecsta HS52
Hankook
ION FlexClimate
Michelin
CrossClimate 2
Number of tests
10
1
24
Best position
#2
#1
#1
Average position
6.0
1.0
2.7
Latest test
2026
2025
2025
Available sizes
104
27
150

Wet

Wet
Kumho Ecsta HS52
77%
Hankook ION FlexClimate
90%
Michelin CrossClimate 2
72%
Wet braking
Kumho Ecsta HS52
80%
Hankook ION FlexClimate
90%
Michelin CrossClimate 2
75%
Aquaplaning - cross
Kumho Ecsta HS52
66%
Hankook ION FlexClimate
90%
Michelin CrossClimate 2
75%
Aquaplaning - longitudal
Kumho Ecsta HS52
73%
Hankook ION FlexClimate
95%
Michelin CrossClimate 2
79%
Wet circle cornering
Kumho Ecsta HS52
89%
Michelin CrossClimate 2
77%
Wet handling
Kumho Ecsta HS52
79%
Hankook ION FlexClimate
84%
Michelin CrossClimate 2
74%

Comfort

Comfort
Kumho Ecsta HS52
77%
Hankook ION FlexClimate
78%
Michelin CrossClimate 2
73%
Exterior noise
Kumho Ecsta HS52
73%
Hankook ION FlexClimate
81%
Michelin CrossClimate 2
84%
Comfort
Kumho Ecsta HS52
76%
Michelin CrossClimate 2
83%

Dry

Dry
Kumho Ecsta HS52
87%
Hankook ION FlexClimate
90%
Michelin CrossClimate 2
87%
Dry braking
Kumho Ecsta HS52
89%
Hankook ION FlexClimate
90%
Michelin CrossClimate 2
92%
Dry handling
Kumho Ecsta HS52
85%
Hankook ION FlexClimate
90%
Michelin CrossClimate 2
82%

Costs

Costs
Kumho Ecsta HS52
76%
Hankook ION FlexClimate
84%
Michelin CrossClimate 2
78%
Rolling resistance
Kumho Ecsta HS52
70%
Hankook ION FlexClimate
84%
Michelin CrossClimate 2
87%
Mileage
Kumho Ecsta HS52
79%
Michelin CrossClimate 2
74%
Price/value
Kumho Ecsta HS52
97%
Michelin CrossClimate 2
43%

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Add to comparison

Popular brands
New comparison