18 Shops · 56,847+ Products

Comparison: Kumho Ecsta HS52 vs. Hankook ION Evo vs. Nexen N Fera Primus

Test Profile

Kumho
Ecsta HS52
Hankook
ION Evo
Nexen
N Fera Primus
Number of tests
10
1
6
Best position
#2
#1
#10
Average position
6.0
1.0
12.7
Latest test
2026
2025
2024
Available sizes
104
64
60

Wet

Wet
Kumho Ecsta HS52
77%
Hankook ION Evo
89%
Nexen N Fera Primus
73%
Wet braking
Kumho Ecsta HS52
80%
Hankook ION Evo
97%
Nexen N Fera Primus
76%
Aquaplaning - cross
Kumho Ecsta HS52
66%
Hankook ION Evo
87%
Nexen N Fera Primus
77%
Aquaplaning - longitudal
Kumho Ecsta HS52
73%
Hankook ION Evo
77%
Nexen N Fera Primus
79%
Wet circle cornering
Kumho Ecsta HS52
89%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
Nexen N Fera Primus
70%
Wet handling
Kumho Ecsta HS52
79%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
Nexen N Fera Primus
64%

Comfort

Comfort
Kumho Ecsta HS52
77%
Hankook ION Evo
72%
Nexen N Fera Primus
65%
Exterior noise
Kumho Ecsta HS52
73%
Hankook ION Evo
66%
Nexen N Fera Primus
66%
Comfort
Kumho Ecsta HS52
71%
Hankook ION Evo
78%
Nexen N Fera Primus
53%

Dry

Dry
Kumho Ecsta HS52
87%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
Nexen N Fera Primus
62%
Dry braking
Kumho Ecsta HS52
89%
Hankook ION Evo
91%
Nexen N Fera Primus
72%
Dry handling
Kumho Ecsta HS52
85%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
Nexen N Fera Primus
53%

Costs

Costs
Kumho Ecsta HS52
76%
Hankook ION Evo
71%
Nexen N Fera Primus
59%
Rolling resistance
Kumho Ecsta HS52
70%
Hankook ION Evo
69%
Nexen N Fera Primus
59%
Mileage
Kumho Ecsta HS52
79%
Hankook ION Evo
82%
Nexen N Fera Primus
49%

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Add to comparison

Popular brands
New comparison