18 Shops · 56,847+ Products

Comparator | Contact Us

Comparison: Kumho Ecsta HS52 vs. Hankook ION Evo vs. Michelin Primacy 5

Kumho Ecsta HS52

Kumho

Ecsta HS52

VS

Hankook ION Evo

Hankook

ION Evo

Michelin Primacy 5

Michelin

Primacy 5

Also compare with

PremiumContact 7

Efficientgrip 2 SUV

Test Profile

Kumho

Ecsta HS52

Hankook

ION Evo

Michelin

Primacy 5

Number of tests

10

1

3

Best position

#2

#1

#1

Average position

6.0

1.0

4.7

Latest test

2026

2025

2026

Available sizes

104

64

126

Wet

Wet

Kumho Ecsta HS52

77%

Hankook ION Evo

89%

Michelin Primacy 5

58%

Wet braking

Kumho Ecsta HS52

80%

Hankook ION Evo

97%

Michelin Primacy 5

65%

Aquaplaning - cross

Kumho Ecsta HS52

66%

Hankook ION Evo

87%

Aquaplaning - longitudal

Kumho Ecsta HS52

73%

Hankook ION Evo

77%

Michelin Primacy 5

51%

Wet circle cornering

Kumho Ecsta HS52

89%

Hankook ION Evo

92%

Wet handling

Kumho Ecsta HS52

79%

Hankook ION Evo

92%

Comfort

Comfort

Kumho Ecsta HS52

77%

Hankook ION Evo

72%

Michelin Primacy 5

1%

Exterior noise

Kumho Ecsta HS52

73%

Hankook ION Evo

66%

Comfort

Kumho Ecsta HS52

71%

Hankook ION Evo

78%

Dry

Dry

Kumho Ecsta HS52

87%

Hankook ION Evo

92%

Michelin Primacy 5

73%

Dry braking

Kumho Ecsta HS52

89%

Hankook ION Evo

91%

Michelin Primacy 5

76%

Dry handling

Kumho Ecsta HS52

85%

Hankook ION Evo

92%

Michelin Primacy 5

69%

Costs

Costs

Kumho Ecsta HS52

76%

Hankook ION Evo

71%

Michelin Primacy 5

63%

Rolling resistance

Kumho Ecsta HS52

70%

Hankook ION Evo

69%

Michelin Primacy 5

63%

Mileage

Kumho Ecsta HS52

79%

Hankook ION Evo

82%

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Add to comparison