18 Shops · 56,847+ Products

Comparator | Contact Us

Comparison: Kumho Ecsta HS52 vs. Hankook ION Evo vs. BFGoodrich Advantage

Kumho Ecsta HS52

Kumho

Ecsta HS52

VS

Hankook ION Evo

Hankook

ION Evo

BFGoodrich Advantage

BFGoodrich

Advantage

Also compare with

PremiumContact 7

Pilot Sport 5

Test Profile

Kumho

Ecsta HS52

Hankook

ION Evo

BFGoodrich

Advantage

Number of tests

10

1

14

Best position

#2

#1

#8

Average position

6.0

1.0

13.4

Latest test

2026

2025

2026

Available sizes

104

64

153

Wet

Wet

Kumho Ecsta HS52

77%

Hankook ION Evo

89%

BFGoodrich Advantage

61%

Aquaplaning - longitudal

Kumho Ecsta HS52

73%

Hankook ION Evo

77%

BFGoodrich Advantage

61%

Wet braking

Kumho Ecsta HS52

80%

Hankook ION Evo

97%

BFGoodrich Advantage

77%

Aquaplaning - cross

Kumho Ecsta HS52

66%

Hankook ION Evo

87%

BFGoodrich Advantage

53%

Wet handling

Kumho Ecsta HS52

79%

Hankook ION Evo

92%

BFGoodrich Advantage

57%

Wet circle cornering

Kumho Ecsta HS52

89%

Hankook ION Evo

92%

BFGoodrich Advantage

69%

Comfort

Comfort

Kumho Ecsta HS52

77%

Hankook ION Evo

72%

BFGoodrich Advantage

79%

Exterior noise

Kumho Ecsta HS52

73%

Hankook ION Evo

66%

BFGoodrich Advantage

68%

Comfort

Kumho Ecsta HS52

76%

BFGoodrich Advantage

72%

Dry

Dry

Kumho Ecsta HS52

87%

Hankook ION Evo

92%

BFGoodrich Advantage

72%

Dry braking

Kumho Ecsta HS52

89%

Hankook ION Evo

91%

BFGoodrich Advantage

76%

Dry handling

Kumho Ecsta HS52

85%

Hankook ION Evo

92%

BFGoodrich Advantage

80%

Costs

Costs

Kumho Ecsta HS52

76%

Hankook ION Evo

71%

BFGoodrich Advantage

68%

Rolling resistance

Kumho Ecsta HS52

70%

Hankook ION Evo

69%

BFGoodrich Advantage

66%

Mileage

Kumho Ecsta HS52

79%

Hankook ION Evo

82%

BFGoodrich Advantage

63%

Price/value

Kumho Ecsta HS52

97%

Hankook ION Evo

60%

BFGoodrich Advantage

65%

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Add to comparison