18 Shops · 56,847+ Products

Comparison: Kumho Ecsta HS52 vs. Hankook ION Evo vs. BFGoodrich Advantage

Test Profile

Kumho
Ecsta HS52
Hankook
ION Evo
BFGoodrich
Advantage
Number of tests
10
1
14
Best position
#2
#1
#8
Average position
6.0
1.0
13.4
Latest test
2026
2025
2026
Available sizes
104
64
153

Wet

Wet
Kumho Ecsta HS52
77%
Hankook ION Evo
89%
BFGoodrich Advantage
61%
Aquaplaning - longitudal
Kumho Ecsta HS52
73%
Hankook ION Evo
77%
BFGoodrich Advantage
61%
Wet braking
Kumho Ecsta HS52
80%
Hankook ION Evo
97%
BFGoodrich Advantage
77%
Aquaplaning - cross
Kumho Ecsta HS52
66%
Hankook ION Evo
87%
BFGoodrich Advantage
53%
Wet handling
Kumho Ecsta HS52
79%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
BFGoodrich Advantage
57%
Wet circle cornering
Kumho Ecsta HS52
89%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
BFGoodrich Advantage
69%

Comfort

Comfort
Kumho Ecsta HS52
77%
Hankook ION Evo
72%
BFGoodrich Advantage
79%
Exterior noise
Kumho Ecsta HS52
73%
Hankook ION Evo
66%
BFGoodrich Advantage
68%
Comfort
Kumho Ecsta HS52
76%
BFGoodrich Advantage
72%

Dry

Dry
Kumho Ecsta HS52
87%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
BFGoodrich Advantage
72%
Dry braking
Kumho Ecsta HS52
89%
Hankook ION Evo
91%
BFGoodrich Advantage
76%
Dry handling
Kumho Ecsta HS52
85%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
BFGoodrich Advantage
80%

Costs

Costs
Kumho Ecsta HS52
76%
Hankook ION Evo
71%
BFGoodrich Advantage
68%
Rolling resistance
Kumho Ecsta HS52
70%
Hankook ION Evo
69%
BFGoodrich Advantage
66%
Mileage
Kumho Ecsta HS52
79%
Hankook ION Evo
82%
BFGoodrich Advantage
63%
Price/value
Kumho Ecsta HS52
97%
Hankook ION Evo
60%
BFGoodrich Advantage
65%

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Add to comparison

Popular brands
New comparison