Comparison: Kumho Ecsta HS52 vs. GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+ vs. Falken e.Ziex vs. GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3 vs. Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

Upper-middle

Kumho

Ecsta HS52

VS

Also compare with

PILOT ALPIN 5

SportContact 7

WinterContact TS 870

Test Profile

Ecsta HS52

UltraGrip Performance+

e.Ziex

UltraGrip Performance 3

Efficientgrip 2 SUV

Number of tests

10

23

3

24

5

Best position

#2

#1

#2

#1

Average position

6.0

3.3

3.7

2.7

2.2

Latest test

2026

2025

Available sizes

104

176

34

302

63

Wet

Kumho Ecsta HS52

77%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+

83%

Falken e.Ziex

75%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3

83%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

83%

Wet braking

Kumho Ecsta HS52

80%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+

80%

Falken e.Ziex

87%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3

80%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

85%

Aquaplaning - cross

Kumho Ecsta HS52

66%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+

87%

Falken e.Ziex

61%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3

74%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

82%

Aquaplaning - longitudal

Kumho Ecsta HS52

73%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+

83%

Falken e.Ziex

68%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3

74%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

78%

Wet circle cornering

Kumho Ecsta HS52

89%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+

82%

Falken e.Ziex

77%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3

86%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

79%

Wet handling

Kumho Ecsta HS52

79%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+

89%

Falken e.Ziex

69%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3

91%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

86%

Comfort

Kumho Ecsta HS52

77%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+

84%

Falken e.Ziex

78%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3

85%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

92%

Exterior noise

Kumho Ecsta HS52

73%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+

81%

Falken e.Ziex

78%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3

80%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

90%

Comfort

Kumho Ecsta HS52

76%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+

79%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3

73%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

84%

Interior noise

Kumho Ecsta HS52

71%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+

91%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3

84%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

100%

Dry

Kumho Ecsta HS52

87%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+

78%

Falken e.Ziex

85%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3

79%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

83%

Dry braking

Kumho Ecsta HS52

89%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+

84%

Falken e.Ziex

88%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3

72%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

82%

Dry handling

Kumho Ecsta HS52

85%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+

81%

Falken e.Ziex

81%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3

82%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

84%

Dry performance

Kumho Ecsta HS52

72%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+

72%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3

56%

Costs

Kumho Ecsta HS52

76%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+

80%

Falken e.Ziex

80%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3

70%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

84%

Rolling resistance

Kumho Ecsta HS52

70%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+

80%

Falken e.Ziex

95%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3

75%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

77%

Mileage

Kumho Ecsta HS52

79%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+

78%

Falken e.Ziex

60%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3

56%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

96%

Price/value

Kumho Ecsta HS52

97%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+

69%

Falken e.Ziex

60%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3

68%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

87%

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Comparison: Kumho Ecsta HS52 vs. GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+ vs. Falken e.Ziex vs. GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3 vs. Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

Ecsta HS52

UltraGrip Performance+

e.Ziex

UltraGrip Performance 3

Efficientgrip 2 SUV

Test Profile

Wet

Comfort

Dry

Costs

Dimensions and prices

Add to comparison