Comparison: Kumho Ecsta HS52 vs. GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+ vs. Falken e.Ziex vs. Continental UltraContact NXT

Upper-middle

Kumho

Ecsta HS52

VS

Also compare with

PILOT ALPIN 5

SportContact 7

WinterContact TS 870

Test Profile

Ecsta HS52

UltraGrip Performance+

e.Ziex

UltraContact NXT

Number of tests

10

23

3

2

Best position

#2

#1

#2

#1

Average position

6.0

3.3

3.7

1.0

Latest test

2026

2025

Available sizes

104

176

34

23

Wet

Kumho Ecsta HS52

77%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+

83%

Falken e.Ziex

75%

Continental UltraContact NXT

56%

Wet braking

Kumho Ecsta HS52

80%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+

80%

Falken e.Ziex

87%

Continental UltraContact NXT

51%

Aquaplaning - cross

Kumho Ecsta HS52

66%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+

87%

Falken e.Ziex

61%

Continental UltraContact NXT

68%

Aquaplaning - longitudal

Kumho Ecsta HS52

73%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+

83%

Falken e.Ziex

68%

Continental UltraContact NXT

65%

Wet circle cornering

Kumho Ecsta HS52

89%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+

82%

Falken e.Ziex

77%

Continental UltraContact NXT

1%

Wet handling

Kumho Ecsta HS52

79%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+

89%

Falken e.Ziex

69%

Continental UltraContact NXT

45%

Comfort

Kumho Ecsta HS52

77%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+

84%

Falken e.Ziex

78%

Continental UltraContact NXT

44%

Exterior noise

Kumho Ecsta HS52

73%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+

81%

Falken e.Ziex

78%

Continental UltraContact NXT

42%

Comfort

Kumho Ecsta HS52

76%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+

79%

Interior noise

Kumho Ecsta HS52

71%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+

91%

Dry

Kumho Ecsta HS52

87%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+

78%

Falken e.Ziex

85%

Continental UltraContact NXT

75%

Dry braking

Kumho Ecsta HS52

89%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+

84%

Falken e.Ziex

88%

Continental UltraContact NXT

63%

Dry handling

Kumho Ecsta HS52

85%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+

81%

Falken e.Ziex

81%

Continental UltraContact NXT

51%

Costs

Kumho Ecsta HS52

76%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+

80%

Falken e.Ziex

80%

Continental UltraContact NXT

88%

Rolling resistance

Kumho Ecsta HS52

70%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+

80%

Falken e.Ziex

95%

Continental UltraContact NXT

88%

Mileage

Kumho Ecsta HS52

79%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+

78%

Falken e.Ziex

60%

Price/value

Kumho Ecsta HS52

97%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+

69%

Falken e.Ziex

60%

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Comparison: Kumho Ecsta HS52 vs. GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+ vs. Falken e.Ziex vs. Continental UltraContact NXT

Ecsta HS52

UltraGrip Performance+

e.Ziex

UltraContact NXT

Test Profile

Wet

Comfort

Dry

Costs

Dimensions and prices

Add to comparison