Comparison: Kumho Ecsta HS52 vs. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 vs. Vredestein Quatrac

Upper-middle

Kumho

Ecsta HS52

VS

Efficientgrip Performance 2

Quatrac

9.2

R15 – R20

Also compare with

PremiumContact 7

UltraContact NXT

Cinturato All Season SF3

Test Profile

Ecsta HS52

Efficientgrip Performance 2

Quatrac

Number of tests

10

3

16

Best position

#2

#1

Average position

6.0

3.3

3.1

Latest test

2026

2025

Available sizes

104

40

86

Wet

Kumho Ecsta HS52

77%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

77%

Vredestein Quatrac

87%

Wet braking

Kumho Ecsta HS52

80%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

78%

Vredestein Quatrac

86%

Aquaplaning - cross

Kumho Ecsta HS52

66%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

69%

Vredestein Quatrac

82%

Aquaplaning - longitudal

Kumho Ecsta HS52

73%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

66%

Vredestein Quatrac

84%

Wet circle cornering

Kumho Ecsta HS52

89%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

61%

Vredestein Quatrac

88%

Wet handling

Kumho Ecsta HS52

79%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

74%

Vredestein Quatrac

92%

Wet performance

Kumho Ecsta HS52

55%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

75%

Vredestein Quatrac

92%

Comfort

Kumho Ecsta HS52

77%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

70%

Vredestein Quatrac

88%

Exterior noise

Kumho Ecsta HS52

73%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

67%

Vredestein Quatrac

86%

Comfort

Kumho Ecsta HS52

76%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

90%

Vredestein Quatrac

78%

Interior noise

Kumho Ecsta HS52

71%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

73%

Vredestein Quatrac

95%

Dry

Kumho Ecsta HS52

87%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

75%

Vredestein Quatrac

82%

Dry braking

Kumho Ecsta HS52

89%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

77%

Vredestein Quatrac

79%

Dry handling

Kumho Ecsta HS52

85%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

77%

Vredestein Quatrac

81%

Dry performance

Kumho Ecsta HS52

72%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

64%

Vredestein Quatrac

78%

Costs

Kumho Ecsta HS52

76%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

83%

Vredestein Quatrac

67%

Rolling resistance

Kumho Ecsta HS52

70%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

72%

Vredestein Quatrac

77%

Mileage

Kumho Ecsta HS52

79%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

99%

Vredestein Quatrac

56%

Price/value

Kumho Ecsta HS52

97%

Vredestein Quatrac

64%

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Comparison: Kumho Ecsta HS52 vs. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 vs. Vredestein Quatrac

Ecsta HS52

Efficientgrip Performance 2

Quatrac

Test Profile

Wet

Comfort

Dry

Costs

Dimensions and prices

Add to comparison