Comparison: Kumho Ecsta HS52 vs. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 vs. Michelin e.Primacy vs. Hankook ION Evo vs. Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

Upper-middle

Kumho

Ecsta HS52

VS

Also compare with

SportContact 7

PremiumContact 7

UltraContact NXT

Test Profile

Ecsta HS52

Efficientgrip Performance 2

e.Primacy

ION Evo

Efficientgrip 2 SUV

Number of tests

10

3

4

1

5

Best position

#2

#3

#1

Average position

6.0

3.3

12.0

1.0

2.2

Latest test

2026

2025

Available sizes

104

40

111

64

63

Wet

Kumho Ecsta HS52

77%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

77%

Michelin e.Primacy

61%

Hankook ION Evo

89%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

83%

Aquaplaning - longitudal

Kumho Ecsta HS52

73%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

66%

Michelin e.Primacy

65%

Hankook ION Evo

77%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

78%

Wet braking

Kumho Ecsta HS52

80%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

78%

Michelin e.Primacy

62%

Hankook ION Evo

97%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

85%

Aquaplaning - cross

Kumho Ecsta HS52

66%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

69%

Michelin e.Primacy

65%

Hankook ION Evo

87%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

82%

Wet handling

Kumho Ecsta HS52

79%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

74%

Michelin e.Primacy

52%

Hankook ION Evo

92%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

86%

Wet circle cornering

Kumho Ecsta HS52

89%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

61%

Michelin e.Primacy

52%

Hankook ION Evo

92%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

79%

Comfort

Kumho Ecsta HS52

77%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

70%

Michelin e.Primacy

62%

Hankook ION Evo

72%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

92%

Exterior noise

Kumho Ecsta HS52

73%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

67%

Michelin e.Primacy

70%

Hankook ION Evo

66%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

90%

Comfort

Kumho Ecsta HS52

71%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

59%

Michelin e.Primacy

54%

Hankook ION Evo

78%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

83%

Dry

Kumho Ecsta HS52

87%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

75%

Michelin e.Primacy

74%

Hankook ION Evo

92%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

83%

Dry braking

Kumho Ecsta HS52

89%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

77%

Michelin e.Primacy

63%

Hankook ION Evo

91%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

82%

Dry handling

Kumho Ecsta HS52

85%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

77%

Michelin e.Primacy

80%

Hankook ION Evo

92%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

84%

Costs

Kumho Ecsta HS52

76%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

83%

Michelin e.Primacy

81%

Hankook ION Evo

71%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

84%

Rolling resistance

Kumho Ecsta HS52

70%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

72%

Michelin e.Primacy

67%

Hankook ION Evo

69%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

77%

Mileage

Kumho Ecsta HS52

79%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

99%

Michelin e.Primacy

100%

Hankook ION Evo

82%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

96%

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Comparison: Kumho Ecsta HS52 vs. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 vs. Michelin e.Primacy vs. Hankook ION Evo vs. Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

Ecsta HS52

Efficientgrip Performance 2

e.Primacy

ION Evo

Efficientgrip 2 SUV

Test Profile

Wet

Comfort

Dry

Costs

Dimensions and prices

Add to comparison