18 Shops · 56,847+ Products
THETYRELAB.COM

Comparison: Kumho Ecsta HS52 vs. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 vs. Michelin e.Primacy vs. Hankook ION Evo vs. Falken e.Ziex

Kumho Ecsta HS52Upper-middle
KumhoKumho

Ecsta HS52

7.4
R14 – R20
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2Premium
GoodYearGoodYear

Efficientgrip Performance 2

8.5
R15 – R21
Michelin e.PrimacyPremium
MichelinMichelin

e.Primacy

7.1
R15 – R21
Hankook ION EvoPremium
HankookHankook

ION Evo

9.0
R17 – R22
Falken e.ZiexUpper-middle
FalkenFalken

e.Ziex

9.0
R15 – R21
Also compare with
SportContact 7 PremiumContact 7 UltraContact NXT

Test Profile

Kumho
Ecsta HS52
GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2
Michelin
e.Primacy
Hankook
ION Evo
Falken
e.Ziex
Number of tests
10
3
4
1
3
Best position
#2
#2
#3
#1
#2
Average position
6.0
3.3
12.0
1.0
3.7
Latest test
2026
2026
2025
2025
2025
Available sizes
104
40
111
64
34

Wet

Wet
Kumho Ecsta HS52
77%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
77%
Michelin e.Primacy
61%
Hankook ION Evo
89%
Falken e.Ziex
75%
Wet braking
Kumho Ecsta HS52
80%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
78%
Michelin e.Primacy
62%
Hankook ION Evo
97%
Falken e.Ziex
87%
Aquaplaning - cross
Kumho Ecsta HS52
66%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
69%
Michelin e.Primacy
65%
Hankook ION Evo
87%
Falken e.Ziex
61%
Aquaplaning - longitudal
Kumho Ecsta HS52
73%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
66%
Michelin e.Primacy
65%
Hankook ION Evo
77%
Falken e.Ziex
68%
Wet circle cornering
Kumho Ecsta HS52
89%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
61%
Michelin e.Primacy
52%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
Falken e.Ziex
77%
Wet handling
Kumho Ecsta HS52
79%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
74%
Michelin e.Primacy
52%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
Falken e.Ziex
69%

Comfort

Comfort
Kumho Ecsta HS52
77%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
70%
Michelin e.Primacy
62%
Hankook ION Evo
72%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Exterior noise
Kumho Ecsta HS52
73%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
67%
Michelin e.Primacy
70%
Hankook ION Evo
66%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Comfort
Kumho Ecsta HS52
71%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
59%
Michelin e.Primacy
54%
Hankook ION Evo
78%
Falken e.Ziex
78%

Dry

Dry
Kumho Ecsta HS52
87%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
75%
Michelin e.Primacy
74%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
Falken e.Ziex
85%
Dry braking
Kumho Ecsta HS52
89%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
77%
Michelin e.Primacy
63%
Hankook ION Evo
91%
Falken e.Ziex
88%
Dry handling
Kumho Ecsta HS52
85%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
77%
Michelin e.Primacy
80%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
Falken e.Ziex
81%

Costs

Costs
Kumho Ecsta HS52
76%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
83%
Michelin e.Primacy
81%
Hankook ION Evo
71%
Falken e.Ziex
80%
Rolling resistance
Kumho Ecsta HS52
70%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
72%
Michelin e.Primacy
67%
Hankook ION Evo
69%
Falken e.Ziex
95%
Mileage
Kumho Ecsta HS52
79%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
99%
Michelin e.Primacy
100%
Hankook ION Evo
82%
Falken e.Ziex
60%

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Add to comparison

Popular brands
New comparison