18 Shops · 56,847+ Products
THETYRELAB.COM

Comparison: Kumho Ecsta HS52 vs. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 vs. Hankook ION Evo vs. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 vs. Falken e.Ziex vs. Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

Kumho Ecsta HS52Upper-middle
KumhoKumho

Ecsta HS52

7.4
R14 – R20
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2Premium
GoodYearGoodYear

Efficientgrip Performance 2

8.5
R15 – R21
Hankook ION EvoPremium
HankookHankook

ION Evo

9.0
R17 – R22
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2Premium
GoodyearGoodyear

Efficient Grip Performance 2

7.8
R15 – R20
Falken e.ZiexUpper-middle
FalkenFalken

e.Ziex

9.0
R15 – R21
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUVPremium
GoodyearGoodyear

Efficientgrip 2 SUV

9.2
R16 – R22
Also compare with
SportContact 7 PremiumContact 7 UltraContact NXT

Test Profile

Kumho
Ecsta HS52
GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2
Hankook
ION Evo
Goodyear
Efficient Grip Performance 2
Falken
e.Ziex
Goodyear
Efficientgrip 2 SUV
Number of tests
10
3
1
18
3
5
Best position
#2
#2
#1
#1
#2
#1
Average position
6.0
3.3
1.0
6.1
3.7
2.2
Latest test
2026
2026
2025
2024
2025
2025
Available sizes
104
40
64
47
34
63

Wet

Wet
Kumho Ecsta HS52
77%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
77%
Hankook ION Evo
89%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
76%
Falken e.Ziex
75%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
83%
Aquaplaning - cross
Kumho Ecsta HS52
66%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
69%
Hankook ION Evo
87%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
73%
Falken e.Ziex
61%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
82%
Aquaplaning - longitudal
Kumho Ecsta HS52
73%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
66%
Hankook ION Evo
77%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
69%
Falken e.Ziex
68%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
78%
Wet braking
Kumho Ecsta HS52
80%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
78%
Hankook ION Evo
97%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
72%
Falken e.Ziex
87%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
85%
Wet circle cornering
Kumho Ecsta HS52
89%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
61%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
89%
Falken e.Ziex
77%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
79%
Wet handling
Kumho Ecsta HS52
79%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
74%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
75%
Falken e.Ziex
69%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
86%

Comfort

Comfort
Kumho Ecsta HS52
77%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
70%
Hankook ION Evo
72%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
76%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
92%
Exterior noise
Kumho Ecsta HS52
73%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
67%
Hankook ION Evo
66%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
75%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
90%
Comfort
Kumho Ecsta HS52
76%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
90%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
90%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
84%

Dry

Dry
Kumho Ecsta HS52
87%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
75%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
75%
Falken e.Ziex
85%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
83%
Dry braking
Kumho Ecsta HS52
89%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
77%
Hankook ION Evo
91%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
73%
Falken e.Ziex
88%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
82%
Dry handling
Kumho Ecsta HS52
85%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
77%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
73%
Falken e.Ziex
81%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
84%

Costs

Costs
Kumho Ecsta HS52
76%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
83%
Hankook ION Evo
71%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
91%
Falken e.Ziex
80%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
84%
Rolling resistance
Kumho Ecsta HS52
70%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
72%
Hankook ION Evo
69%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
84%
Falken e.Ziex
95%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
77%
Mileage
Kumho Ecsta HS52
79%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
99%
Hankook ION Evo
82%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
100%
Falken e.Ziex
60%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
96%

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Add to comparison

Popular brands
New comparison