Comparison: Kumho Ecsta HS52 vs. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 vs. GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+ vs. Continental PremiumContact 7

Upper-middle

Kumho

Ecsta HS52

VS

Also compare with

PILOT ALPIN 5

WinterContact TS 870

Ventus Evo

Test Profile

Ecsta HS52

Efficientgrip Performance 2

UltraGrip Performance+

PremiumContact 7

Number of tests

10

3

23

26

Best position

#2

#1

Average position

6.0

3.3

2.2

Latest test

2026

2025

2026

Available sizes

104

40

176

66

Wet

Kumho Ecsta HS52

77%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

77%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+

83%

Continental PremiumContact 7

90%

Wet braking

Kumho Ecsta HS52

80%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

78%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+

80%

Continental PremiumContact 7

94%

Aquaplaning - cross

Kumho Ecsta HS52

66%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

69%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+

87%

Continental PremiumContact 7

76%

Aquaplaning - longitudal

Kumho Ecsta HS52

73%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

66%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+

83%

Continental PremiumContact 7

75%

Wet circle cornering

Kumho Ecsta HS52

89%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

61%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+

82%

Continental PremiumContact 7

92%

Wet handling

Kumho Ecsta HS52

79%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

74%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+

89%

Continental PremiumContact 7

90%

Comfort

Kumho Ecsta HS52

77%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

70%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+

84%

Continental PremiumContact 7

76%

Exterior noise

Kumho Ecsta HS52

73%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

67%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+

81%

Continental PremiumContact 7

69%

Comfort

Kumho Ecsta HS52

76%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

90%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+

79%

Interior noise

Kumho Ecsta HS52

71%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

73%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+

91%

Continental PremiumContact 7

88%

Dry

Kumho Ecsta HS52

87%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

75%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+

78%

Continental PremiumContact 7

90%

Dry braking

Kumho Ecsta HS52

89%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

77%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+

84%

Continental PremiumContact 7

90%

Dry handling

Kumho Ecsta HS52

85%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

77%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+

81%

Continental PremiumContact 7

85%

Dry performance

Kumho Ecsta HS52

72%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

64%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+

72%

Continental PremiumContact 7

35%

Costs

Kumho Ecsta HS52

76%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

83%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+

80%

Continental PremiumContact 7

76%

Rolling resistance

Kumho Ecsta HS52

70%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

72%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+

80%

Continental PremiumContact 7

75%

Mileage

Kumho Ecsta HS52

79%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

99%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+

78%

Continental PremiumContact 7

81%

Price/value

Kumho Ecsta HS52

97%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+

69%

Continental PremiumContact 7

77%

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Comparison: Kumho Ecsta HS52 vs. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 vs. GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+ vs. Continental PremiumContact 7

Ecsta HS52

Efficientgrip Performance 2

UltraGrip Performance+

PremiumContact 7

Test Profile

Wet

Comfort

Dry

Costs

Dimensions and prices

Add to comparison