Comparison: Kumho Ecsta HS52 vs. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 vs. Fulda EcoControl HP2 vs. Falken e.Ziex

Upper-middle

Kumho

Ecsta HS52

VS

Also compare with

SportContact 7

PremiumContact 7

UltraContact NXT

Test Profile

Ecsta HS52

Efficientgrip Performance 2

EcoControl HP2

e.Ziex

Number of tests

10

3

8

3

Best position

#2

#4

#2

Average position

6.0

3.3

12.8

3.7

Latest test

2026

2024

2025

Available sizes

104

40

30

34

Wet

Kumho Ecsta HS52

77%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

77%

Fulda EcoControl HP2

65%

Falken e.Ziex

75%

Wet braking

Kumho Ecsta HS52

80%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

78%

Fulda EcoControl HP2

63%

Falken e.Ziex

87%

Aquaplaning - cross

Kumho Ecsta HS52

66%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

69%

Fulda EcoControl HP2

83%

Falken e.Ziex

61%

Aquaplaning - longitudal

Kumho Ecsta HS52

73%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

66%

Fulda EcoControl HP2

73%

Falken e.Ziex

68%

Wet circle cornering

Kumho Ecsta HS52

89%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

61%

Fulda EcoControl HP2

73%

Falken e.Ziex

77%

Wet handling

Kumho Ecsta HS52

79%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

74%

Fulda EcoControl HP2

62%

Falken e.Ziex

69%

Comfort

Kumho Ecsta HS52

77%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

70%

Fulda EcoControl HP2

77%

Falken e.Ziex

78%

Exterior noise

Kumho Ecsta HS52

73%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

67%

Fulda EcoControl HP2

76%

Falken e.Ziex

78%

Comfort

Kumho Ecsta HS52

71%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

59%

Fulda EcoControl HP2

69%

Falken e.Ziex

78%

Dry

Kumho Ecsta HS52

87%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

75%

Fulda EcoControl HP2

74%

Falken e.Ziex

85%

Dry braking

Kumho Ecsta HS52

89%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

77%

Fulda EcoControl HP2

78%

Falken e.Ziex

88%

Dry handling

Kumho Ecsta HS52

85%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

77%

Fulda EcoControl HP2

67%

Falken e.Ziex

81%

Costs

Kumho Ecsta HS52

76%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

83%

Fulda EcoControl HP2

77%

Falken e.Ziex

80%

Rolling resistance

Kumho Ecsta HS52

70%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

72%

Fulda EcoControl HP2

72%

Falken e.Ziex

95%

Mileage

Kumho Ecsta HS52

79%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

99%

Fulda EcoControl HP2

82%

Falken e.Ziex

60%

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Comparison: Kumho Ecsta HS52 vs. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 vs. Fulda EcoControl HP2 vs. Falken e.Ziex

Ecsta HS52

Efficientgrip Performance 2

EcoControl HP2

e.Ziex

Test Profile

Wet

Comfort

Dry

Costs

Dimensions and prices

Add to comparison