18 Shops · 56,847+ Products

Comparison: Kumho Ecsta HS52 vs. Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV vs. Dunlop Winter vs. Falken e.Ziex

Test Profile

Kumho
Ecsta HS52
Goodyear
Efficientgrip 2 SUV
Dunlop
Winter
Falken
e.Ziex
Number of tests
10
5
2
3
Best position
#2
#1
#1
#2
Average position
6.0
2.2
1.5
3.7
Latest test
2026
2025
2025
2025
Available sizes
104
63
65
34

Wet

Wet
Kumho Ecsta HS52
77%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
83%
Dunlop Winter
73%
Falken e.Ziex
75%
Aquaplaning - cross
Kumho Ecsta HS52
66%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
82%
Dunlop Winter
73%
Falken e.Ziex
61%
Aquaplaning - longitudal
Kumho Ecsta HS52
73%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
78%
Dunlop Winter
71%
Falken e.Ziex
68%
Wet braking
Kumho Ecsta HS52
80%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
85%
Dunlop Winter
84%
Falken e.Ziex
87%
Wet handling
Kumho Ecsta HS52
79%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
86%
Dunlop Winter
67%
Falken e.Ziex
69%
Wet circle cornering
Kumho Ecsta HS52
89%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
79%
Dunlop Winter
63%
Falken e.Ziex
77%

Comfort

Comfort
Kumho Ecsta HS52
77%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
92%
Dunlop Winter
87%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Exterior noise
Kumho Ecsta HS52
73%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
90%
Dunlop Winter
87%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Comfort
Kumho Ecsta HS52
71%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
83%
Falken e.Ziex
78%

Dry

Dry
Kumho Ecsta HS52
87%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
83%
Dunlop Winter
69%
Falken e.Ziex
85%
Dry braking
Kumho Ecsta HS52
89%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
82%
Dunlop Winter
73%
Falken e.Ziex
88%
Dry handling
Kumho Ecsta HS52
85%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
84%
Dunlop Winter
64%
Falken e.Ziex
81%

Costs

Costs
Kumho Ecsta HS52
76%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
84%
Dunlop Winter
83%
Falken e.Ziex
80%
Rolling resistance
Kumho Ecsta HS52
70%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
77%
Dunlop Winter
81%
Falken e.Ziex
95%
Mileage
Kumho Ecsta HS52
79%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
96%
Dunlop Winter
87%
Falken e.Ziex
60%

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Add to comparison

Popular brands
New comparison