Comparison: Kumho Ecsta HS52 vs. Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV vs. Bridgestone Blizzak 6 vs. Falken e.Ziex

Upper-middle

Kumho

Ecsta HS52

VS

Also compare with

SportContact 7

PremiumContact 7

UltraContact NXT

Test Profile

Ecsta HS52

Efficientgrip 2 SUV

Blizzak 6

e.Ziex

Number of tests

10

5

14

3

Best position

#2

#1

#2

Average position

6.0

2.2

3.6

3.7

Latest test

2026

2025

Available sizes

104

63

188

34

Wet

Kumho Ecsta HS52

77%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

83%

Bridgestone Blizzak 6

78%

Falken e.Ziex

75%

Aquaplaning - longitudal

Kumho Ecsta HS52

73%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

78%

Bridgestone Blizzak 6

68%

Falken e.Ziex

68%

Wet braking

Kumho Ecsta HS52

80%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

85%

Bridgestone Blizzak 6

75%

Falken e.Ziex

87%

Aquaplaning - cross

Kumho Ecsta HS52

66%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

82%

Bridgestone Blizzak 6

64%

Falken e.Ziex

61%

Wet circle cornering

Kumho Ecsta HS52

89%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

79%

Bridgestone Blizzak 6

83%

Falken e.Ziex

77%

Wet handling

Kumho Ecsta HS52

79%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

86%

Bridgestone Blizzak 6

81%

Falken e.Ziex

69%

Comfort

Kumho Ecsta HS52

77%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

92%

Bridgestone Blizzak 6

81%

Falken e.Ziex

78%

Exterior noise

Kumho Ecsta HS52

73%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

90%

Bridgestone Blizzak 6

66%

Falken e.Ziex

78%

Comfort

Kumho Ecsta HS52

76%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

84%

Bridgestone Blizzak 6

79%

Dry

Kumho Ecsta HS52

87%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

83%

Bridgestone Blizzak 6

72%

Falken e.Ziex

85%

Dry braking

Kumho Ecsta HS52

89%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

82%

Bridgestone Blizzak 6

56%

Falken e.Ziex

88%

Dry handling

Kumho Ecsta HS52

85%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

84%

Bridgestone Blizzak 6

82%

Falken e.Ziex

81%

Dry performance

Kumho Ecsta HS52

72%

Bridgestone Blizzak 6

59%

Costs

Kumho Ecsta HS52

76%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

84%

Bridgestone Blizzak 6

68%

Falken e.Ziex

80%

Rolling resistance

Kumho Ecsta HS52

70%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

77%

Bridgestone Blizzak 6

85%

Falken e.Ziex

95%

Mileage

Kumho Ecsta HS52

79%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

96%

Bridgestone Blizzak 6

28%

Falken e.Ziex

60%

Price/value

Kumho Ecsta HS52

97%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

87%

Bridgestone Blizzak 6

64%

Falken e.Ziex

60%

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Comparison: Kumho Ecsta HS52 vs. Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV vs. Bridgestone Blizzak 6 vs. Falken e.Ziex

Ecsta HS52

Efficientgrip 2 SUV

Blizzak 6

e.Ziex

Test Profile

Wet

Comfort

Dry

Costs

Dimensions and prices

Add to comparison