18 Shops · 56,847+ Products

Comparison: Kumho Ecsta HS52 vs. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 vs. Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV vs. Firestone Roadhawk 2 vs. Falken e.Ziex

In this review, we compare two summer tyres: the Kumho Ecsta HS52 and the Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2.


Kumho Ecsta HS52


The Kumho Ecsta HS52 is a touring tyre that replaced the Kumho Ecsta HS51. In our website's rating, it scored 78%. Its strengths include Dry braking, Dry handling, Wet braking and Price/value, according to autobild test. However, it displays minor weaknesses in Aquaplaning and rolling comfort. On average, this tyre achieved a top three position in comparative tests, notably securing the third spot in both Vibilagare and Autobild tests.


Verdict


The Kumho Ecsta HS52 delivers convincing performance on wet and dry surfaces with short braking distances. It provides safe handling on both dry and wet roads with excellent predicted mileage and low wear and fuel consumption. However, slight weaknesses in Aquaplaning behaviour and high tyre weight are noticeable.


Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2


Replacing the Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance, the Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 scores a respectable 84% rating on our website. Its most praised categories are mileage, Price/value and Comfort, as marked in Autobild test. Its weaknesses include slightly average Aquaplaning resistance, and extended dry braking. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 also impressively grabbed the first position in ADAC test, outperforming 50 competitive tyres.


Verdict


The Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 is a well-balanced tyre, offering excellent handling on wet and dry surfaces, low noise levels, good comfort, and low rolling resistance. Its high mileage, low rolling resistance and Best ratings in cost category make it an attractive choice. However, it loses points for its slightly average Aquaplaning resistance and extended dry braking.


Overall Comparison


Summing up all the tests, the Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 slightly edges out the Kumho Ecsta HS52 for its better overall performance, handling and comfort. However, the Kumho Ecsta HS52 goes head to head, considering its affordable price and strong performance on both wet and dry surfaces.


Check out the detailed specification of Kumho Ecsta HS52 and Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2. Learn more about the manufacturers - Kumho and Goodyear.

Test Profile

Kumho
Ecsta HS52
Goodyear
Efficient Grip Performance 2
Goodyear
Efficientgrip 2 SUV
Firestone
Roadhawk 2
Falken
e.Ziex
Number of tests
10
18
5
6
3
Best position
#2
#1
#1
#3
#2
Average position
6.0
6.1
2.2
4.7
3.7
Latest test
2026
2024
2025
2026
2025
Available sizes
104
47
63
146
34

Wet

Wet
Kumho Ecsta HS52
77%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
76%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
83%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
86%
Falken e.Ziex
75%
Wet braking
Kumho Ecsta HS52
80%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
72%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
85%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
78%
Falken e.Ziex
87%
Aquaplaning - cross
Kumho Ecsta HS52
66%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
73%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
82%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
88%
Falken e.Ziex
61%
Aquaplaning - longitudal
Kumho Ecsta HS52
73%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
69%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
78%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
95%
Falken e.Ziex
68%
Wet circle cornering
Kumho Ecsta HS52
89%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
89%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
79%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
84%
Falken e.Ziex
77%
Wet handling
Kumho Ecsta HS52
79%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
75%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
86%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
88%
Falken e.Ziex
69%

Comfort

Comfort
Kumho Ecsta HS52
77%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
76%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
92%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
77%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Exterior noise
Kumho Ecsta HS52
73%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
75%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
90%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
66%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Comfort
Kumho Ecsta HS52
76%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
90%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
84%

Dry

Dry
Kumho Ecsta HS52
87%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
75%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
83%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
79%
Falken e.Ziex
85%
Dry braking
Kumho Ecsta HS52
89%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
73%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
82%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
81%
Falken e.Ziex
88%
Dry handling
Kumho Ecsta HS52
85%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
73%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
84%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
77%
Falken e.Ziex
81%

Costs

Costs
Kumho Ecsta HS52
76%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
91%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
84%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
68%
Falken e.Ziex
80%
Rolling resistance
Kumho Ecsta HS52
70%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
84%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
77%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
85%
Falken e.Ziex
95%
Mileage
Kumho Ecsta HS52
79%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
100%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
96%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
38%
Falken e.Ziex
60%
Price/value
Kumho Ecsta HS52
97%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
97%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
87%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
60%
Falken e.Ziex
60%

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Add to comparison

Popular brands
New comparison