18 Shops · 56,847+ Products

Comparison: Kumho Ecsta HS52 vs. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 vs. Falken ZIEX ZE310 Ecorun

3 mutual test(s) with detailed data

In this review, we compare two summer tyres: the Kumho Ecsta HS52 and the Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2.


Kumho Ecsta HS52


The Kumho Ecsta HS52 is a touring tyre that replaced the Kumho Ecsta HS51. In our website's rating, it scored 78%. Its strengths include Dry braking, Dry handling, Wet braking and Price/value, according to autobild test. However, it displays minor weaknesses in Aquaplaning and rolling comfort. On average, this tyre achieved a top three position in comparative tests, notably securing the third spot in both Vibilagare and Autobild tests.


Verdict


The Kumho Ecsta HS52 delivers convincing performance on wet and dry surfaces with short braking distances. It provides safe handling on both dry and wet roads with excellent predicted mileage and low wear and fuel consumption. However, slight weaknesses in Aquaplaning behaviour and high tyre weight are noticeable.


Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2


Replacing the Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance, the Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 scores a respectable 84% rating on our website. Its most praised categories are mileage, Price/value and Comfort, as marked in Autobild test. Its weaknesses include slightly average Aquaplaning resistance, and extended dry braking. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 also impressively grabbed the first position in ADAC test, outperforming 50 competitive tyres.


Verdict


The Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 is a well-balanced tyre, offering excellent handling on wet and dry surfaces, low noise levels, good comfort, and low rolling resistance. Its high mileage, low rolling resistance and Best ratings in cost category make it an attractive choice. However, it loses points for its slightly average Aquaplaning resistance and extended dry braking.


Overall Comparison


Summing up all the tests, the Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 slightly edges out the Kumho Ecsta HS52 for its better overall performance, handling and comfort. However, the Kumho Ecsta HS52 goes head to head, considering its affordable price and strong performance on both wet and dry surfaces.


Check out the detailed specification of Kumho Ecsta HS52 and Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2. Learn more about the manufacturers - Kumho and Goodyear.

Test Profile

Kumho
Ecsta HS52
Goodyear
Efficient Grip Performance 2
Falken
ZIEX ZE310 Ecorun
Number of tests
10
18
23
Best position
#2
#1
#2
Average position
6.0
6.1
6.6
Latest test
2026
2024
2025
Available sizes
104
47
194

Performance comparison

Averaged from 3 tests

Wet Performance
Kumho Ecsta HS52
73%
Kumho
Ecsta HS52
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
72%
Goodyear
Efficient Grip Performance 2
Falken ZIEX ZE310 Ecorun
76%
Falken
ZIEX ZE310 Ecorun
Wet Braking
Kumho Ecsta HS52
79%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
61%
Falken ZIEX ZE310 Ecorun
76%
Wet Handling
Kumho Ecsta HS52
72%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
69%
Falken ZIEX ZE310 Ecorun
63%
Wet Circle Cornering
Kumho Ecsta HS52
82%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
82%
Falken ZIEX ZE310 Ecorun
73%
Aquaplaning Longitudinal
Kumho Ecsta HS52
69%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
69%
Falken ZIEX ZE310 Ecorun
82%
Aquaplaning Cross
Kumho Ecsta HS52
61%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
80%
Falken ZIEX ZE310 Ecorun
87%
Dry Performance
Kumho Ecsta HS52
83%
Kumho
Ecsta HS52
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
65%
Goodyear
Efficient Grip Performance 2
Falken ZIEX ZE310 Ecorun
78%
Falken
ZIEX ZE310 Ecorun
Dry Braking
Kumho Ecsta HS52
82%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
75%
Falken ZIEX ZE310 Ecorun
78%
Dry Handling
Kumho Ecsta HS52
84%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
54%
Falken ZIEX ZE310 Ecorun
78%
Comfort & Noise
Kumho Ecsta HS52
70%
Kumho
Ecsta HS52
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
Goodyear
Efficient Grip Performance 2
Falken ZIEX ZE310 Ecorun
70%
Falken
ZIEX ZE310 Ecorun
Noise Exterior
Kumho Ecsta HS52
62%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
76%
Falken ZIEX ZE310 Ecorun
71%
Noise Interior
Kumho Ecsta HS52
71%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
71%
Falken ZIEX ZE310 Ecorun
53%
Ride Comfort
Kumho Ecsta HS52
76%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
86%
Falken ZIEX ZE310 Ecorun
86%
Economy
Kumho Ecsta HS52
71%
Kumho
Ecsta HS52
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
96%
Goodyear
Efficient Grip Performance 2
Falken ZIEX ZE310 Ecorun
59%
Falken
ZIEX ZE310 Ecorun
Rolling Resistance
Kumho Ecsta HS52
63%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
92%
Falken ZIEX ZE310 Ecorun
59%
Mileage
Kumho Ecsta HS52
78%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
100%
Falken ZIEX ZE310 Ecorun
59%

Tests used in comparison

OrganizationSeasonYearDimension
AutobildAutobild
Summer
2024205/55 R16View
ADACADAC
Summer
2024215/55 R17View
AutobildAutobild
Summer
2022215/55 R17View

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

View general comparison

Add to comparison

Popular brands
New comparison