18 Shops · 56,847+ Products

Comparison: Kumho Ecsta HS52 vs. Firestone Roadhawk 2 vs. Michelin Primacy 4+ vs. Falken e.Ziex

Test Profile

Kumho
Ecsta HS52
Firestone
Roadhawk 2
Michelin
Primacy 4+
Falken
e.Ziex
Number of tests
10
6
13
3
Best position
#2
#3
#1
#2
Average position
6.0
4.7
4.3
3.7
Latest test
2026
2026
2025
2025
Available sizes
104
146
123
34

Wet

Wet
Kumho Ecsta HS52
77%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
86%
Michelin Primacy 4+
75%
Falken e.Ziex
75%
Wet braking
Kumho Ecsta HS52
80%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
78%
Michelin Primacy 4+
79%
Falken e.Ziex
87%
Aquaplaning - cross
Kumho Ecsta HS52
66%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
88%
Michelin Primacy 4+
72%
Falken e.Ziex
61%
Aquaplaning - longitudal
Kumho Ecsta HS52
73%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
95%
Michelin Primacy 4+
79%
Falken e.Ziex
68%
Wet circle cornering
Kumho Ecsta HS52
89%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
84%
Michelin Primacy 4+
78%
Falken e.Ziex
77%
Wet handling
Kumho Ecsta HS52
79%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
88%
Michelin Primacy 4+
78%
Falken e.Ziex
69%

Comfort

Comfort
Kumho Ecsta HS52
77%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
77%
Michelin Primacy 4+
86%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Exterior noise
Kumho Ecsta HS52
73%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
66%
Michelin Primacy 4+
77%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Comfort
Kumho Ecsta HS52
71%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
71%
Michelin Primacy 4+
83%
Falken e.Ziex
78%

Dry

Dry
Kumho Ecsta HS52
87%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
79%
Michelin Primacy 4+
80%
Falken e.Ziex
85%
Dry braking
Kumho Ecsta HS52
89%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
81%
Michelin Primacy 4+
87%
Falken e.Ziex
88%
Dry handling
Kumho Ecsta HS52
85%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
77%
Michelin Primacy 4+
83%
Falken e.Ziex
81%

Costs

Costs
Kumho Ecsta HS52
76%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
68%
Michelin Primacy 4+
80%
Falken e.Ziex
80%
Rolling resistance
Kumho Ecsta HS52
70%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
85%
Michelin Primacy 4+
82%
Falken e.Ziex
95%
Mileage
Kumho Ecsta HS52
79%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
38%
Michelin Primacy 4+
91%
Falken e.Ziex
60%

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Add to comparison

Popular brands
New comparison