Comparison: Kumho Ecsta HS52 vs. Firestone Roadhawk 2 vs. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 vs. Hankook ION Evo vs. Falken e.Ziex

Upper-middle

Kumho

Ecsta HS52

VS

Also compare with

SportContact 7

PremiumContact 7

UltraContact NXT

Test Profile

Ecsta HS52

Roadhawk 2

Efficientgrip Performance 2

ION Evo

e.Ziex

Number of tests

10

6

3

1

3

Best position

#2

#3

#2

#1

#2

Average position

6.0

4.7

3.3

1.0

3.7

Latest test

2026

2025

Available sizes

104

146

40

64

34

Wet

Kumho Ecsta HS52

77%

Firestone Roadhawk 2

86%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

77%

Hankook ION Evo

89%

Falken e.Ziex

75%

Aquaplaning - longitudal

Kumho Ecsta HS52

73%

Firestone Roadhawk 2

95%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

66%

Hankook ION Evo

77%

Falken e.Ziex

68%

Wet braking

Kumho Ecsta HS52

80%

Firestone Roadhawk 2

78%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

78%

Hankook ION Evo

97%

Falken e.Ziex

87%

Aquaplaning - cross

Kumho Ecsta HS52

66%

Firestone Roadhawk 2

88%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

69%

Hankook ION Evo

87%

Falken e.Ziex

61%

Wet handling

Kumho Ecsta HS52

79%

Firestone Roadhawk 2

88%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

74%

Hankook ION Evo

92%

Falken e.Ziex

69%

Wet circle cornering

Kumho Ecsta HS52

89%

Firestone Roadhawk 2

84%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

61%

Hankook ION Evo

92%

Falken e.Ziex

77%

Comfort

Kumho Ecsta HS52

77%

Firestone Roadhawk 2

77%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

70%

Hankook ION Evo

72%

Falken e.Ziex

78%

Exterior noise

Kumho Ecsta HS52

73%

Firestone Roadhawk 2

66%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

67%

Hankook ION Evo

66%

Falken e.Ziex

78%

Comfort

Kumho Ecsta HS52

71%

Firestone Roadhawk 2

71%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

59%

Hankook ION Evo

78%

Falken e.Ziex

78%

Dry

Kumho Ecsta HS52

87%

Firestone Roadhawk 2

79%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

75%

Hankook ION Evo

92%

Falken e.Ziex

85%

Dry braking

Kumho Ecsta HS52

89%

Firestone Roadhawk 2

81%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

77%

Hankook ION Evo

91%

Falken e.Ziex

88%

Dry handling

Kumho Ecsta HS52

85%

Firestone Roadhawk 2

77%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

77%

Hankook ION Evo

92%

Falken e.Ziex

81%

Costs

Kumho Ecsta HS52

76%

Firestone Roadhawk 2

68%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

83%

Hankook ION Evo

71%

Falken e.Ziex

80%

Rolling resistance

Kumho Ecsta HS52

70%

Firestone Roadhawk 2

85%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

72%

Hankook ION Evo

69%

Falken e.Ziex

95%

Mileage

Kumho Ecsta HS52

79%

Firestone Roadhawk 2

38%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

99%

Hankook ION Evo

82%

Falken e.Ziex

60%

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Comparison: Kumho Ecsta HS52 vs. Firestone Roadhawk 2 vs. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 vs. Hankook ION Evo vs. Falken e.Ziex

Ecsta HS52

Roadhawk 2

Efficientgrip Performance 2

ION Evo

e.Ziex

Test Profile

Wet

Comfort

Dry

Costs

Dimensions and prices

Add to comparison