Comparison: Kumho Ecsta HS52 vs. Falken e.Ziex vs. Pirelli Cinturato P7 C2

Upper-middle

Kumho

Ecsta HS52

VS

e.Ziex

Cinturato P7 C2

8.9

R16 – R20

Also compare with

SportContact 7

PremiumContact 7

UltraContact NXT

Test Profile

Ecsta HS52

e.Ziex

Cinturato P7 C2

Number of tests

10

3

9

Best position

#2

Average position

6.0

3.7

5.8

Latest test

2026

2025

Available sizes

104

34

92

Wet

Kumho Ecsta HS52

77%

Falken e.Ziex

75%

Pirelli Cinturato P7 C2

82%

Wet braking

Kumho Ecsta HS52

80%

Falken e.Ziex

87%

Pirelli Cinturato P7 C2

78%

Aquaplaning - cross

Kumho Ecsta HS52

66%

Falken e.Ziex

61%

Pirelli Cinturato P7 C2

79%

Aquaplaning - longitudal

Kumho Ecsta HS52

73%

Falken e.Ziex

68%

Pirelli Cinturato P7 C2

81%

Wet circle cornering

Kumho Ecsta HS52

89%

Falken e.Ziex

77%

Pirelli Cinturato P7 C2

86%

Wet handling

Kumho Ecsta HS52

79%

Falken e.Ziex

69%

Pirelli Cinturato P7 C2

90%

Comfort

Kumho Ecsta HS52

77%

Falken e.Ziex

78%

Pirelli Cinturato P7 C2

87%

Exterior noise

Kumho Ecsta HS52

73%

Falken e.Ziex

78%

Pirelli Cinturato P7 C2

83%

Comfort

Kumho Ecsta HS52

71%

Falken e.Ziex

78%

Pirelli Cinturato P7 C2

84%

Dry

Kumho Ecsta HS52

87%

Falken e.Ziex

85%

Pirelli Cinturato P7 C2

88%

Dry braking

Kumho Ecsta HS52

89%

Falken e.Ziex

88%

Pirelli Cinturato P7 C2

87%

Dry handling

Kumho Ecsta HS52

85%

Falken e.Ziex

81%

Pirelli Cinturato P7 C2

85%

Costs

Kumho Ecsta HS52

76%

Falken e.Ziex

80%

Pirelli Cinturato P7 C2

66%

Rolling resistance

Kumho Ecsta HS52

70%

Falken e.Ziex

95%

Pirelli Cinturato P7 C2

70%

Mileage

Kumho Ecsta HS52

79%

Falken e.Ziex

60%

Pirelli Cinturato P7 C2

65%

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Comparison: Kumho Ecsta HS52 vs. Falken e.Ziex vs. Pirelli Cinturato P7 C2

Ecsta HS52

e.Ziex

Cinturato P7 C2

Test Profile

Wet

Comfort

Dry

Costs

Dimensions and prices

Add to comparison