18 Shops · 56,847+ Products

Comparator | Contact Us

Comparison: Kumho Ecsta HS52 vs. Falken e.Ziex vs. Hankook ION Evo

Kumho Ecsta HS52

Kumho

Ecsta HS52

VS

Falken e.Ziex

Falken

e.Ziex

Hankook ION Evo

Hankook

ION Evo

Also compare with

PremiumContact 7

UltraContact NXT

Test Profile

Kumho

Ecsta HS52

Falken

e.Ziex

Hankook

ION Evo

Number of tests

10

3

1

Best position

#2

#2

#1

Average position

6.0

3.7

1.0

Latest test

2026

2025

2025

Available sizes

104

34

64

Wet

Wet

Kumho Ecsta HS52

77%

Falken e.Ziex

75%

Hankook ION Evo

89%

Wet braking

Kumho Ecsta HS52

80%

Falken e.Ziex

87%

Hankook ION Evo

97%

Aquaplaning - cross

Kumho Ecsta HS52

66%

Falken e.Ziex

61%

Hankook ION Evo

87%

Aquaplaning - longitudal

Kumho Ecsta HS52

73%

Falken e.Ziex

68%

Hankook ION Evo

77%

Wet circle cornering

Kumho Ecsta HS52

89%

Falken e.Ziex

77%

Hankook ION Evo

92%

Wet handling

Kumho Ecsta HS52

79%

Falken e.Ziex

69%

Hankook ION Evo

92%

Comfort

Comfort

Kumho Ecsta HS52

77%

Falken e.Ziex

78%

Hankook ION Evo

72%

Exterior noise

Kumho Ecsta HS52

73%

Falken e.Ziex

78%

Hankook ION Evo

66%

Comfort

Kumho Ecsta HS52

71%

Falken e.Ziex

78%

Hankook ION Evo

78%

Dry

Dry

Kumho Ecsta HS52

87%

Falken e.Ziex

85%

Hankook ION Evo

92%

Dry braking

Kumho Ecsta HS52

89%

Falken e.Ziex

88%

Hankook ION Evo

91%

Dry handling

Kumho Ecsta HS52

85%

Falken e.Ziex

81%

Hankook ION Evo

92%

Costs

Costs

Kumho Ecsta HS52

76%

Falken e.Ziex

80%

Hankook ION Evo

71%

Rolling resistance

Kumho Ecsta HS52

70%

Falken e.Ziex

95%

Hankook ION Evo

69%

Mileage

Kumho Ecsta HS52

79%

Falken e.Ziex

60%

Hankook ION Evo

82%

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Add to comparison