18 Shops · 56,847+ Products

Comparison: Kumho Ecsta HS52 vs. Falken e.Ziex vs. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance

Test Profile

Kumho
Ecsta HS52
Falken
e.Ziex
Goodyear
Efficient Grip Performance
Number of tests
10
3
16
Best position
#2
#2
#3
Average position
6.0
3.7
5.5
Latest test
2026
2025
2023
Available sizes
104
34
153

Wet

Wet
Kumho Ecsta HS52
77%
Falken e.Ziex
75%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
81%
Wet braking
Kumho Ecsta HS52
80%
Falken e.Ziex
87%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
76%
Aquaplaning - cross
Kumho Ecsta HS52
66%
Falken e.Ziex
61%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
89%
Aquaplaning - longitudal
Kumho Ecsta HS52
73%
Falken e.Ziex
68%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
86%
Wet circle cornering
Kumho Ecsta HS52
89%
Falken e.Ziex
77%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
81%
Wet handling
Kumho Ecsta HS52
79%
Falken e.Ziex
69%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
87%

Comfort

Comfort
Kumho Ecsta HS52
77%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
77%
Exterior noise
Kumho Ecsta HS52
73%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
75%
Comfort
Kumho Ecsta HS52
71%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
91%
Interior noise
Kumho Ecsta HS52
71%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
73%

Dry

Dry
Kumho Ecsta HS52
87%
Falken e.Ziex
85%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
83%
Dry braking
Kumho Ecsta HS52
89%
Falken e.Ziex
88%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
83%
Dry handling
Kumho Ecsta HS52
85%
Falken e.Ziex
81%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
93%

Costs

Costs
Kumho Ecsta HS52
76%
Falken e.Ziex
80%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
73%
Rolling resistance
Kumho Ecsta HS52
70%
Falken e.Ziex
95%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
86%
Mileage
Kumho Ecsta HS52
79%
Falken e.Ziex
60%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
64%

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Add to comparison

Popular brands
New comparison