18 Shops · 56,847+ Products

Comparison: Kumho Ecsta HS52 vs. Falken e.Ziex vs. Firestone Roadhawk 2

Test Profile

Kumho
Ecsta HS52
Falken
e.Ziex
Firestone
Roadhawk 2
Number of tests
10
3
6
Best position
#2
#2
#3
Average position
6.0
3.7
4.7
Latest test
2026
2025
2026
Available sizes
104
34
146

Wet

Wet
Kumho Ecsta HS52
77%
Falken e.Ziex
75%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
86%
Aquaplaning - longitudal
Kumho Ecsta HS52
73%
Falken e.Ziex
68%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
95%
Wet braking
Kumho Ecsta HS52
80%
Falken e.Ziex
87%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
78%
Aquaplaning - cross
Kumho Ecsta HS52
66%
Falken e.Ziex
61%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
88%
Wet handling
Kumho Ecsta HS52
79%
Falken e.Ziex
69%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
88%
Wet circle cornering
Kumho Ecsta HS52
89%
Falken e.Ziex
77%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
84%

Comfort

Comfort
Kumho Ecsta HS52
77%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
77%
Exterior noise
Kumho Ecsta HS52
73%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
66%
Comfort
Kumho Ecsta HS52
71%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
71%

Dry

Dry
Kumho Ecsta HS52
87%
Falken e.Ziex
85%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
79%
Dry braking
Kumho Ecsta HS52
89%
Falken e.Ziex
88%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
81%
Dry handling
Kumho Ecsta HS52
85%
Falken e.Ziex
81%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
77%

Costs

Costs
Kumho Ecsta HS52
76%
Falken e.Ziex
80%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
68%
Rolling resistance
Kumho Ecsta HS52
70%
Falken e.Ziex
95%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
85%
Mileage
Kumho Ecsta HS52
79%
Falken e.Ziex
60%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
38%

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Add to comparison

Popular brands
New comparison