18 Shops · 56,847+ Products

Comparison: Kumho Ecsta HS52 vs. Falken e.Ziex vs. Continental PremiumContact 7

Test Profile

Kumho
Ecsta HS52
Falken
e.Ziex
Continental
PremiumContact 7
Number of tests
10
3
26
Best position
#2
#2
#1
Average position
6.0
3.7
2.2
Latest test
2026
2025
2026
Available sizes
104
34
66

Wet

Wet
Kumho Ecsta HS52
77%
Falken e.Ziex
75%
Continental PremiumContact 7
90%
Wet braking
Kumho Ecsta HS52
80%
Falken e.Ziex
87%
Continental PremiumContact 7
94%
Aquaplaning - cross
Kumho Ecsta HS52
66%
Falken e.Ziex
61%
Continental PremiumContact 7
76%
Aquaplaning - longitudal
Kumho Ecsta HS52
73%
Falken e.Ziex
68%
Continental PremiumContact 7
75%
Wet circle cornering
Kumho Ecsta HS52
89%
Falken e.Ziex
77%
Continental PremiumContact 7
92%
Wet handling
Kumho Ecsta HS52
79%
Falken e.Ziex
69%
Continental PremiumContact 7
90%

Comfort

Comfort
Kumho Ecsta HS52
77%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Continental PremiumContact 7
76%
Exterior noise
Kumho Ecsta HS52
73%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Continental PremiumContact 7
69%
Comfort
Kumho Ecsta HS52
71%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Continental PremiumContact 7
75%

Dry

Dry
Kumho Ecsta HS52
87%
Falken e.Ziex
85%
Continental PremiumContact 7
90%
Dry braking
Kumho Ecsta HS52
89%
Falken e.Ziex
88%
Continental PremiumContact 7
90%
Dry handling
Kumho Ecsta HS52
85%
Falken e.Ziex
81%
Continental PremiumContact 7
85%

Costs

Costs
Kumho Ecsta HS52
76%
Falken e.Ziex
80%
Continental PremiumContact 7
76%
Rolling resistance
Kumho Ecsta HS52
70%
Falken e.Ziex
95%
Continental PremiumContact 7
75%
Mileage
Kumho Ecsta HS52
79%
Falken e.Ziex
60%
Continental PremiumContact 7
81%
Price/value
Kumho Ecsta HS52
97%
Falken e.Ziex
60%
Continental PremiumContact 7
77%

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Add to comparison

Popular brands
New comparison